Re: [jsr-314-open] JSF2 bashing on TSS

You know, that wasn't nearly as bad as I thought. I found the Spring vs Java EE thread pretty fascinating, actually. I'll have to tell Reza that :-). I added a small post, but honestly, I felt like JSF 2 was represented pretty well, and not just by us.

--- Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | twitter: jsfcentral +1 203-404-4848 x3 Sign up for the JSFCentral newsletter: http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:47 PM, David Geary <clarity.training(a)gmail.com > > wrote: > >> I just posted something as well. I think it's important that we publicly >> acknowledge that JSF 1 left a lot to be desired, but that we are working >> hard to fix that in JSF 2. I also think it's important that we let people >> know we are listening, and that we seriously consider what they say, even if >> they may be somewhat belligerent. I also added a link to >> www.javaserverfaces.org in my reply. >> > > Great post. Some posts need no response because there would be nothing > more to add or take away. I think your post falls in that category ;) > > -Dan > > -- > Dan Allen > Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action > Registered Linux User #231597 > > http://mojavelinux.com > http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction > http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen >