I would hope we take this in. However, we would probably have to
specify a default-name for the FacesServlet then, so that people can
override.
Also, is the postfix-mapping the way to go right now? With resource
handling, prefix mapping might be easier to pre-configure?
regards,
Martin
On 11/3/09, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I can't remember if this topic was ever resolved, but in an EE 6
container,
will it be necessary to include the FacesServlet declaration in web.xml? I
would assume that if the declaration is absent, but WEB-INF/faces-config.xml
present, the declaration would be implicit and the mapping default to *.jsf.
Is this something that could get resolved before EE 6 platform goes final?
Think about it, when was the last time you declared the JspServlet?
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces