Re: [jsr-314-open] <h:dataTable> binding vs. ui:repeat
Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
FYI -- a sneak peek. This is working -- with seam el in this example,
of course.
Comment now "or forever hold your peace unless it needs to be
changed" ;)
Hehe.
<a:editText value="#{viewProjectBean.project.vision}"
rendered="#{authorizationBean.isOwner}" >
*<f:valueChangeListener for="value"
action="#{viewProjectBean.test('foo')}" />*
We ended up going with "listener" as the attribute name for <f:event>,
though IIRC, both Dan and Pete preferred "action". While I don't know
that "listener" is the most brilliant name, personally I have always
thought of "action" having a special connotation - ie. actions are
triggered by command components and return outcomes that impact
navigation. Seeing an "action" attribute on a f:valueChangeListener
seems a bit awkward to me.
In terms of spec details, I think we need to clarify what the behavior
is when both "action" (or whatever we call it) and "type" are
specified.
Andy
<f:actionListener for="submit"
binding="#{viewProjectBean.projectChangeListener}" />
<f:converter for="output" converterId="webLinkConverter"/>
</a:editText>
--Lincoln
--
*Lincoln Baxter, III*
Co-Founder of OcpSoft <http://ocpsoft.com>
Author of PrettyFaces <http://ocpsoft.com/prettyfaces> URL Rewriting
for JSF