10:32 a.m.
In preparation for an as yet uncommitted and unscheduled maintenance
relase, I have moved some easy issues in the ChangeLog [1] from the
"proposed" section to the "accepted" section of that document.
I realize that several of you are eager to get started on official work
towards the next official JCP release of JSF. I want to remind you that
just because we're not actively making changes to the frame-maker
document portion of the specification, it doesn't mean we can't make
progress on real issues. Let's continue to use this list until Dan
prevails in getting the JCP to address our issues regarding the move to
the jsr-314-public list.
Ed
[1] http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Projects/Jsf2MR1ChangeLog
--
| ed.burns(a)sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
10:54 a.m.
New subject: [jsr-314-open] [ADMIN] ChangeLog: moved some changes to "accepted"
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns(a)sun.com> wrote:
In preparation for an as yet uncommitted and unscheduled maintenance
relase, I have moved some easy issues in the ChangeLog [1] from the
"proposed" section to the "accepted" section of that document.
Just to provide some context, at Devoxx, Andy, Ed, Roger, Pete and myself
discussed the confusion about whether there would be an MR for Java EE 6
final. It appears that several of us made an assumption that there would be,
but, as it turns out, the EG never officially agreed on it (there was no
vote on the list or in writing). So, officially, there will be no MR for
Java EE 6. But, as Ed has said here, we will begin investigating when this
might be possible in the future. So far, there is no agreed upon date.
I realize that several of you are eager to get started on official work
towards the next official JCP release of JSF. I want to remind you that
just because we're not actively making changes to the frame-maker
document portion of the specification, it doesn't mean we can't make
progress on real issues. Let's continue to use this list until Dan
prevails in getting the JCP to address our issues regarding the move to
the jsr-314-public list.
Yep, I'm still working to get these mailinglists sorted. Perhaps I should
try my Belgian beer and chocolate bribing approach ;)
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
11:55 a.m.
New subject: [jsr-314-open] [ADMIN] ChangeLog: moved some changes to "accepted"
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns(a)sun.com>
wrote:
>
> In preparation for an as yet uncommitted and unscheduled maintenance
> relase, I have moved some easy issues in the ChangeLog [1] from the
> "proposed" section to the "accepted" section of that document.
Just to provide some context, at Devoxx, Andy, Ed, Roger, Pete and myself
discussed the confusion about whether there would be an MR for Java EE 6
final. It appears that several of us made an assumption that there would be,
but, as it turns out, the EG never officially agreed on it (there was no
vote on the list or in writing). So, officially, there will be no MR for
Java EE 6. But, as Ed has said here, we will begin investigating when this
might be possible in the future. So far, there is no agreed upon date.
FWIW, I was under this impression as well. I think it's pretty
important, too. Remember the issues we had with JSF 1.0? I don't want
to see that again.
> I realize that several of you are eager to get started on
official work
> towards the next official JCP release of JSF. I want to remind you that
> just because we're not actively making changes to the frame-maker
> document portion of the specification, it doesn't mean we can't make
> progress on real issues. Let's continue to use this list until Dan
> prevails in getting the JCP to address our issues regarding the move to
> the jsr-314-public list.
Yep, I'm still working to get these mailinglists sorted. Perhaps I should
try my Belgian beer and chocolate bribing approach ;)
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
5506
days inactive
5506
days old
jsr-314-open-mirror@lists.jboss.org
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Dan Allen -
Ed Burns -
Kito Mann