January 2008 - seam-issues - Jboss List Archives

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-2178) Differ timed out session from new session

by Sheng Huang (JIRA)

Differ timed out session from new session ----------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-2178 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2178 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Core Affects Versions: 2.0.0.BETA1 Environment: Windows XP SP2 Reporter: Sheng Huang It will be nice to differ session timeout from newly created session. For example, if I bookmark a page requiring login, it is desired that the application redirects me to the login page and the message "Please log in first" is fine. However, if I have been inactive for a while thus my session times out, it is preferred to display a message like "Your session times out. Please login again". I checked SeamListener and LifeCycle classes, but I cannot find a way to link timed out session with the subsequently created new session. Is this possible that Seam can raise an event or set a flag when timeout then link to the new session after user is redirected to the login page again? I greatly appreciate if you can look at the possibility or let me know if there is a workaround. Thank you very much for your help. Best regards, Sheng -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

16 years, 10 months

2
1
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-2146) New instance of stateful session bean is created twice in the same session

by Igor Laberov (JIRA)

New instance of stateful session bean is created twice in the same session -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-2146 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2146 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Bug Components: EJB3, JSF Affects Versions: 2.0.0.BETA1 Environment: Win XP, JBoss 4.2.1, desktop computer, !! IE 6.0 !! Reporter: Igor Laberov The page consists of dataTable and combo box for data paging. During request, in update model phase, some session bean variable is updated in existing session bean instance. However, during invoke application phase, new instance of stateful session bean is created. No exception were logged and 'destroy' method of existing instance wasn't called. It happens only in IE6. In IE7 and FF2.0 the behavior is OK. Sniffing of HTTP request shows the difference in POST parameters: IE6 - main_form=main_form& main_form%3Adata%3A2%3Adel_=& main_form%3AselectedRemoveIndex=745& main_form%3AdeletePanelOpenedState=& javax.faces.ViewState=_id18 IE7 and FF - main_form=main_form& main_form%3Adata%3A0%3Adel_=& main_form%3AselectedRemoveIndex=589& main_form%3Aj_id97=11& main_form%3AdeletePanelOpenedState=& javax.faces.ViewState=_id9 while, as you can see it differs by one paramer - 'j_id97', which is id of combo box (that wasn't changed by user). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

16 years, 10 months

2
2
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1204) java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1

by Petr Ferschmann (JIRA)

java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBSEAM-1204 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1204 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Bug Components: Framework Affects Versions: 1.2.1.GA Environment: I am using Seam for other serlvets too (SeamFilter). Reporter: Petr Ferschmann Problem is that MockViewHandler expects that there is always . in URL (but in my case it is not). String index out of range: -1 RequestURI=/pes/userAccount/create/ Caused by: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1 at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1762) at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1735) at org.jboss.seam.mock.MockViewHandler.getActionURL(MockViewHandler.java:41) at org.jboss.seam.core.Manager.redirect(Manager.java:1054) at org.jboss.seam.core.Redirect.execute(Redirect.java:137) at org.jboss.seam.exceptions.DebugPageHandler.handle(DebugPageHandler.java:29) at org.jboss.seam.core.Exceptions.handle(Exceptions.java:79) at org.jboss.seam.web.ExceptionFilter.endWebRequestAfterException(ExceptionFilter.java:91) at org.jboss.seam.web.ExceptionFilter.doFilter(ExceptionFilter.java:73) at org.jboss.seam.web.SeamFilter$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:49) at org.jboss.seam.web.MultipartFilter.doFilter(MultipartFilter.java:79) at org.jboss.seam.web.SeamFilter$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:49) at org.jboss.seam.web.SeamFilter.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:84) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1065) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:365) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:185) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:689) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:391) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Dispatcher.forward(Dispatcher.java:268) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.Dispatcher.forward(Dispatcher.java:126) at cz.softeu.rewriter.RewriterFilter.doFilter(RewriterFilter.java:173) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1065) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:365) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:185) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:689) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:391) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:146) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:114) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:139) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:285) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:457) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:751) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:500) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:209) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:357) at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:329) at org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThreadPool.java:475) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

16 years, 10 months

3
5
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-854) Explicit conversation id is lost when using nested conversation

by Yevgen Bushuyev (JIRA)

Explicit conversation id is lost when using nested conversation --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-854 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-854 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Bug Components: Core Affects Versions: 1.1.6.GA Environment: Linux localhost 2.6.3-7mdk #1 Wed Mar 17 15:56:42 CET 2004 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Reporter: Yevgen Bushuyev Each click on <s:link id="action" value="Act" action="#{somethingHome.beginAction}"/> @Begin(nested=true, id="action") public String beginAction() { } leads to creation of a new ConversationEntry, which means that explicit id is ignored. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

16 years, 10 months

2
1
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-672) Allow Query restrictions without value bindings

by Christian Bauer (JIRA)

Allow Query restrictions without value bindings ----------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-672 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-672 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Bug Components: Framework Affects Versions: 1.1.1.GA Reporter: Christian Bauer In framework/Query.java line 164: if (valueBinding==null) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("no value binding in restriction: " + restriction); } I want to have restrictions without value bindings, e.g. in my extended EntityQuery: public List<String> getRestrictions() { List<String> restrictions = new ArrayList<String>(); restrictions.add("parentNode is null"); return restrictions; } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

16 years, 10 months

5
6
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1075) Documentation enhancement for injecting Logger (make clear when static is required)

by Arjan van Bentem (JIRA)

Documentation enhancement for injecting Logger (make clear when static is required) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-1075 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1075 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Documentation Affects Versions: 1.2.0.GA Environment: All Reporter: Arjan van Bentem Priority: Optional The documentation of @Logger in "3.6 Logging" states at http://fisheye.jboss.com/browse/JBoss/jboss-seam/doc/reference/en/modules... It doesn't matter if you declare the log variable static or not—it will work either way. I think this should be enhanced to read, for example: It doesn't matter if you declare the log variable static or not—it will work either way, except for entity beans which needs the logger to be static. ...maybe followed by an example: @Entity @Name("member") @Table(uniqueConstraints = @UniqueConstraint(columnNames = "membername")) public class Member implements Serializable { @Logger private static Log log; : public void setMemberName(String memberName) { log.info("setting memberName"); this.memberName = memberName; } : } At least, that's what I've found; when not declaring it static it will not get injected or is lost (I'm not sure which), and thus would yield a NullPointerException upon usage. Likewise, "22.2. Annotations for bijection" at http://fisheye.jboss.com/browse/JBoss/jboss-seam/doc/reference/en/modules... now states Specifies that a component field is to be injected with an instance of org.jboss.seam.log.Log. ...but maybe this could be extended to read: Specifies that a component field is to be injected with an instance of org.jboss.seam.log.Log. Remember that for entity beans the actual variable needs to be declared static. Cheers, Arjan. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

16 years, 10 months

3
3
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1383) Add conversation propogation="clone" ability

by Michael Youngstrom (JIRA)

Add conversation propogation="clone" ability -------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-1383 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1383 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Core Affects Versions: 1.2.1.GA Reporter: Michael Youngstrom I think the ability to clone a conversation would be useful. Currently if I have an s:link and I do an "open in new window" on that link I now have 2 windows linked to the same conversation which may produce undesirable side effects to the user. So the idea is with s:link or other "GET" types of requests where the user might be inclined to do an "Open in new Window" type of operation we add the ability to clone the conversation when executed. If applied to an s:link the conversation would always be cloned when that link is executed. That way if the user did do an "Open in new window" each window would have 2 independent conversations. This would obviously have the side effect of an orphaned conversation if the user didn't do an "open in new window or tab" so the user would have to weigh the cost of creating orphaned conversations against maintaining the Conversation per window type of semantics this feature would provide. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

16 years, 10 months

2
2
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1745) SpringTransaction fails with HibernateJpaDialect and FlushMode.MANUAL

by Darryl Smith (JIRA)

SpringTransaction fails with HibernateJpaDialect and FlushMode.MANUAL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-1745 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1745 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Bug Components: Spring Reporter: Darryl Smith When using flushMode = MANUAL with org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaDialect, the flushMode is changed to AUTO when beginning transaction SessionImpl.setFlushMode(FlushMode) line: 1286 HibernateSessionProxy.setFlushMode(FlushMode) line: 381 SeamHibernateJpaDialect(HibernateJpaDialect).beginTransaction(EntityManager, TransactionDefinition) line: 60 JpaTransactionManager.doBegin(Object, TransactionDefinition) line: 326 JpaTransactionManager(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager).getTransaction(TransactionDefinition) line: 350 SpringTransaction.begin() line: 74 Unless the transaction definition is set to readOnly spring will change the flushMode to manual HibernateJpaDialect:45 -------------------------------- public Object beginTransaction(EntityManager entityManager, TransactionDefinition definition) throws PersistenceException, SQLException, TransactionException { super.beginTransaction(entityManager, definition); Session session = getSession(entityManager); FlushMode flushMode = session.getFlushMode(); FlushMode previousFlushMode = null; if (definition.isReadOnly()) { // We should suppress flushing for a read-only transaction. session.setFlushMode(FlushMode.MANUAL); previousFlushMode = flushMode; } else { // We need AUTO or COMMIT for a non-read-only transaction. if (flushMode.lessThan(FlushMode.COMMIT)) { session.setFlushMode(FlushMode.AUTO); previousFlushMode = flushMode; } } return new SessionTransactionData(session, previousFlushMode); } Perhaps SpringTransaction should set should pass readOnly transaction def to Spring when the flushMode is manual. Current Workaround: use DefaultJpaDialect -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

16 years, 10 months

2
5
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-2423) checkEntityPermission only checks one method

by Andrew (JIRA)

checkEntityPermission only checks one method -------------------------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-2423 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2423 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Bug Components: Security Affects Versions: 2.0.1.CR1 Environment: JPA on tomcat6 Reporter: Andrew Priority: Critical If an entity has more than one method marked as @PrePersist, only one method is used to check for security. All methods should be considered and the result "anded" together. Code in the Identity bean only checks for a @Restrict on the first method found. In my case, I extend an object with a @PrePersist with no @Restrict. My entity has a method: @PrePersist @PreUpdate @PreRemove @Restrict public void beforeChange() {} (everything is restricted except for read access) According to the PrePersist documentation, multiple PrePersist methods are valid. There are workarounds, but this is dangerous code. If it were not for my unit tests it could have slipped through. The seam documentation does not mention this limitation I marked this as critical as it creates security holes in the application. Here is the relevant code: public void checkEntityPermission(Object entity, EntityAction action) { isLoggedIn(true); PersistenceProvider provider = PersistenceProvider.instance(); Class beanClass = provider.getBeanClass(entity); if (beanClass != null) { String name = Seam.getComponentName(entity.getClass()); if (name == null) name = beanClass.getName(); Method m = null; switch (action) { case READ: m = provider.getPostLoadMethod(beanClass); break; case INSERT: m = provider.getPrePersistMethod(beanClass); break; case UPDATE: m = provider.getPreUpdateMethod(beanClass); break; case DELETE: m = provider.getPreRemoveMethod(beanClass); } Restrict restrict = null; if (m != null && m.isAnnotationPresent(Restrict.class)) { restrict = m.getAnnotation(Restrict.class); } else if (entity.getClass().isAnnotationPresent(Restrict.class)) { restrict = entity.getClass().getAnnotation(Restrict.class); } if (restrict != null) { if (Strings.isEmpty(restrict.value())) { checkPermission(name, action.toString(), entity); } else { checkRestriction(restrict.value()); } } } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

16 years, 10 months

3
5
0 / 0

[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-866) Ajax4JSF integration for Wiki

by Gavin King (JIRA)

Ajax4JSF integration for Wiki ----------------------------- Key: JBSEAM-866 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-866 Project: JBoss Seam Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Wiki Reporter: Gavin King The following features should use Ajax4JSF instead of navigation or full page submits. * Preview panel should be dynamically rendered as user types in the edit box * Edit page and edit directory should use an ajax include instead of navigation * The operations in the edit directory box should use partial submit/render * Login should be implemented using a partial submit/render -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

16 years, 10 months

2
5
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

seam-issues January 2008