[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1891?page=com.atlassian.jira.pl...
]
Pete Muir commented on JBSEAM-1891:
-----------------------------------
based on Sebastians patch I implemented everything I wrote above, and also used abstract
superclasses for common functionality, used the cacheProvider name throughout (w/ the
classname in components.xml being used to select the correct provider), added an XSD,
added a JBoss POJOCache provider for 1, simplified the cache region stuff to just have a
single default region which is configurable from components.xml.
I fiddled the build script to compile the JBoss Cache 1 stuff against JBoss Cache 1 and
the JBoss Cache 2 stuff against JBoss Cache 2
Still need to update the docs and the example to show the new configuration.
Decouple page fragment caching from JBoss Cache
-----------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-1891
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1891
Project: Seam
Issue Type: Task
Components: Core, JSF Controls
Reporter: Christian Bauer
Assignee: Pete Muir
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 2.1.0.BETA1
Attachments: alternative_cache_provider_for_the_page_fragment_cache.patch
The code in UICache and PojoCache only works with this component:
return (org.jboss.cache.aop.PojoCache) Component.getInstance(PojoCache.class,
ScopeType.APPLICATION);
Make this generic so that other cache providers can be used.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira