[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-975) constraint by inclusion on remote calls object fields
by Zalder R (JIRA)
constraint by inclusion on remote calls object fields
-----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-975
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-975
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Remoting
Reporter: Zalder R
Assigned To: Shane Bryzak
Priority: Optional
I think it could be nice to define the fields of the objects returned in a "WebRemote call" with an "include" parameter (instead of the current exclude parameter).
For instance :
now you have :
@WebRemote(exclude = {"secret"})
it would be nice to be able to define :
@WebRemote(include = {"fieldIreallyNeed1", "fieldIreallyNeed2"})
The reasons for this are many :
- security : if the object structure varies over time, you would not want the new fields to be available on the client side by default
- in some cases it's a lot more lightweight (both in the code and in the volume of data sent) to define a minimum set of fields you want instead of the fields you don't want
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 11 months
[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-2215) Interface.js too large
by Robin Young (JIRA)
Interface.js too large
----------------------
Key: JBSEAM-2215
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2215
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Remoting
Affects Versions: 2.0.0.GA
Reporter: Robin Young
Assigned To: Shane Bryzak
The interface.js file produced includes type definitions for EVERY seam component in my system and takes a couple of seconds to serve.
The url is "/seam/resource/remoting/interface.js?navigationSystemService" and is generated by and s:remote tag.
I have added exclude parameters to my WebRemote annotations and this restricts the data sent back back but does nothing to limit the interface.js file produced. Is there any way to slim this down and thus improve the speed of my site?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 11 months
[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-4204) Hot redeploy is broken w/ JBoss AS 5
by Fred Bricon (JIRA)
Hot redeploy is broken w/ JBoss AS 5
------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-4204
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-4204
Project: Seam
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Hot Deploy
Affects Versions: 2.1.2.CR2, 2.1.1.GA, 2.0.2.SP1
Environment: Vista, Eclipse Ganymede 3.4.2, JBoss Tools 3.0.1.GA, JBoss 5.0.1.GA
Reporter: Fred Bricon
Hi
It seems hot deployement doesn't work on JBoss 5.0.1.GA : when editing (and saving) xhtml files, JBoss Tools correctly publish the files to the JBoss AS deploy directory,
but changes are not picked up.
I tested projects created from the JBoss Tools wizards :
- booking (2.0.2.SP1 from the examples menu)
- simple 2.0.2.SP1 project
- simple 2.1.1.GA project
- simple 2.1.2.CR2 project
A simple seam-less dynamic web project, is correctly hot redeployed via JBoss Tools.
[Others|http://seamframework.org/Community/HotDeployAndJBoss5] have experienced this problem. I couldn't say if it's a Seam or an AS5 issue for sure, but I vote for the former.
regards,
Fred Bricon
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 11 months