[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SEAMFACES-50) Extra BeanManagerProviders in service file results in no BM found on beta-1
by Nicklas Karlsson (JIRA)
Extra BeanManagerProviders in service file results in no BM found on beta-1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: SEAMFACES-50
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFACES-50
Project: Seam Faces
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build & Distribution
Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Alpha3
Reporter: Nicklas Karlsson
The faces modules contains the service file for BeanManagerProvider that has
org.jboss.weld.extensions.beanManager.DefaultJndiBeanManagerProvider
org.jboss.weld.extensions.beanManager.JBossJndiBeanManagerProvider
in addition to it's own
org.jboss.seam.faces.beanManager.FacesServletContextBeanManagerProvider
Since the weld extensions also carry the Default/JBoss JNDI providers we end up with 5 providers for that dependency combination. For some reason (classloading?), in the beta1-AS Pete provided this is a problem - resulting in *no* BeanManagers being found (which results in a crash when the faces module SeamExternalContext is set up for the first time)
Removing the JNDI based BeanManagerProviders from faces appears to help the issue itself but it leaves the faces module completely dependent on other modules for BM access
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SEAMSECURITY-12) Introduce session management into Seam Security
by Shane Bryzak (JIRA)
Introduce session management into Seam Security
-----------------------------------------------
Key: SEAMSECURITY-12
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/SEAMSECURITY-12
Project: Seam Security
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Shane Bryzak
Assignee: Shane Bryzak
Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta1
A feature in which many of our users have expressed interest in the past, session management would provide an application-scoped registry of all active user sessions. We should provide features for terminating selected user sessions, setting a policy for multiple user sessions (one/multiple session per user) and provide some kind of formal support for session logging (last login time, ip address, etc). Up till now we've told our users to implement all this stuff manually, but I think it would be cool if we provided support for it out of the box.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-4577) Seam Mail looks up template in wrong context on tomcat with shared seam
by Vasilii Lukoyanov (JIRA)
Seam Mail looks up template in wrong context on tomcat with shared seam
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-4577
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-4577
Project: Seam
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Mail
Affects Versions: 2.2.0.GA
Environment: Tomcat 6.0.18, Seam 2.2.0.GA (shared)
Reporter: Vasilii Lukoyanov
Assignee: Pete Muir
I've got Tomcat with Seam jars shared among all projects (shared.loader=${catalina.base}/shared/seam/*.jar in catalina.properties). Each app has it's own vhost, and deployed to ROOT context.
Layout is the following:
vhosts/siteA.com/ROOT
vhosts/siteB.com/ROOT
Seam application on siteB.com uses seam mail to send confirmation emails. But when it tries to send a message (template is /layout/1email.xhtml)
the following exception is thrown:
javax.servlet.ServletException: #{mailer.sendPreActivationEmail}: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: resource doesn't exist: /layout/1email.xhtml
at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:277)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at org.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.RuleChain.handleRewrite(RuleChain.java:164)
at org.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.RuleChain.doRules(RuleChain.java:141)
at org.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.UrlRewriter.processRequest(UrlRewriter.java:90)
at org.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.UrlRewriteFilter.doFilter(UrlRewriteFilter.java:406)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamFilter$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:83)
at org.jboss.seam.web.IdentityFilter.doFilter(IdentityFilter.java:40)
at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamFilter$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:69)
at org.jboss.seam.web.MultipartFilter.doFilter(MultipartFilter.java:90)
at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamFilter$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:69)
at org.jboss.seam.web.ExceptionFilter.doFilter(ExceptionFilter.java:64)
at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamFilter$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:69)
at org.jboss.seam.web.RedirectFilter.doFilter(RedirectFilter.java:45)
at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamFilter$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:69)
at org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseXMLFilter.doXmlFilter(BaseXMLFilter.java:178)
at org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseFilter.handleRequest(BaseFilter.java:290)
at org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseFilter.processUploadsAndHandleRequest(BaseFilter.java:368)
at org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseFilter.doFilter(BaseFilter.java:495)
at org.jboss.seam.web.Ajax4jsfFilter.doFilter(Ajax4jsfFilter.java:56)
at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamFilter$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:69)
at org.jboss.seam.web.LoggingFilter.doFilter(LoggingFilter.java:60)
at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamFilter$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:69)
at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamFilter.doFilter(SeamFilter.java:158)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:433)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:286)
at org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpAprProcessor.process(AjpAprProcessor.java:419)
at org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpAprProtocol$AjpConnectionHandler.process(AjpAprProtocol.java:378)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AprEndpoint$Worker.run(AprEndpoint.java:1509)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Caused by: javax.faces.FacesException: #{mailer.sendPreActivationEmail}: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: resource doesn't exist: /layout/1email.xhtml
at com.sun.faces.application.ActionListenerImpl.processAction(ActionListenerImpl.java:118)
at javax.faces.component.UICommand.broadcast(UICommand.java:387)
at org.ajax4jsf.component.AjaxViewRoot.processEvents(AjaxViewRoot.java:321)
at org.ajax4jsf.component.AjaxViewRoot.broadcastEvents(AjaxViewRoot.java:296)
at org.ajax4jsf.component.AjaxViewRoot.processPhase(AjaxViewRoot.java:253)
at org.ajax4jsf.component.AjaxViewRoot.processApplication(AjaxViewRoot.java:466)
at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.InvokeApplicationPhase.execute(InvokeApplicationPhase.java:82)
at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.Phase.doPhase(Phase.java:100)
at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:118)
at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:265)
... 39 more
After some investigation I tried to put message template /layout/1email.xhtml into siteA.com context (vhosts/siteA.com/ROOT). After that I was able to send messages from siteB.com application.
Component that sends code:
@Name("mailer")
@Scope(ScopeType.CONVERSATION)
public class Mailer {
@In("renderer")
private Renderer _renderer;
public void sendPreActivationEmail(Account aUser) {
Contexts.getConversationContext().set("account", aUser);
_renderer.render("/email/eganov_pre_activate.xhtml");
}
}
Important note: when tomcat is starting, siteA.com loads first.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-4664) [excel] Need ability to choose between Content-Disposition: inline and Content-Disposition: attachment for downloads
by Eric Jung (JIRA)
[excel] Need ability to choose between Content-Disposition: inline and Content-Disposition: attachment for downloads
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-4664
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBSEAM-4664
Project: Seam
Issue Type: Patch
Components: Excel
Affects Versions: 2.2.1.CR1, 2.2.0.GA, 2.2.0.CR1, 2.1.2.GA, 2.1.2.CR2, 2.1.2.CR1, 2.1.1.GA, 2.1.1.CR2, 2.1.1.CR1, 2.1.0.SP1, 2.1.0.GA, 2.0.3.CR1, 2.0.2.SP1, 2.0.1.GA, 2.0.0.GA, 1.2.1.GA, 1.2.0.GA, 1.1.6.GA, 1.1.5.GA, 1.1.1.GA, 1.1.0.GA, 1.0.1, 1.0, 2.2.1.CR2, 3.0.0.BETA1, The future
Reporter: Eric Jung
Attachments: UIWorkbook.java.diff
When downloading an Excel workbook, org.jboss.seam.excel.ui.UIWorkbook always sends the HTTP response header "Content-Disposition: inline; filename="xxxx.xls" where xxxx is the value of e:workbook's filename attribute.
This header causes problems on some installations of IE 6, 7, and 8 with Excel 2002. Depending on how some settings are configured in the OS, the document may never open after download.
Changing the HTTP response header value to "Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="xxxx.xls" solves the problem. Notice the only difference is the word "attachment" vs. "inline". I would like the capability to choose between these two, just like jboss-seam-pdf.jar provides the same capability with its org.jboss.seam.pdf.ui.UIDocument:
<pdf:document title="Some Title" disposition="attachment"> ... </pdf:document>
Mail attachments in Seam provide the same capability:
<m:attachment value="#{person.photo}" contentType="image/png" disposition="inline"/>
I'm attaching a patch against Seam 2.2 trunk which provides this capability. With this patch, we can now write:
<e:workbook type="jxl" disposition="attachment" ...> ... </e:workbook>
or
<e:workbook type="jxl" disposition="inline" ...> ... </e:workbook>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 2 months
[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-3355) SeamExpressionEvaluator gobbles up exceptions
by Wolfgang Schwendt (JIRA)
SeamExpressionEvaluator gobbles up exceptions
----------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-3355
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-3355
Project: Seam
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.1.0.BETA1
Reporter: Wolfgang Schwendt
Priority: Critical
Rev 8710 of org.jboss.seam.bpm.SeamExpressionEvaluator introduced a serious bug. If the invocation of the method expression (me.invoke(...)) throws an exception such as org.jboss.seam.security.AuthorizationException, the SeamExpressionEvaluator afterwards tries to evaluate the EL expression as a value expression. This of course results in a second exception thrown: PropertyNotFoundException. Consequently, the list "exceptions" has size > 2 (rather than just size==1), which results in SeamExpressionEvaluator throwing an ELException that does not wrap the exception which originally caused the method expression invocation to fail.
The bug was introduced because, compared with earlier versions, the try/catch-blocks for the method expression and value expression evaluation were changed and are now wrong. This is serious because it breaks the handling of any application exception thrown while evaluating the EL method expression, such as AuthorizationException.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 2 months