[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1855?page=all ]
Gavin King reopened JBSEAM-1855:
--------------------------------
Please roll back that change. The contract of addToControl() is very explicit, it is the
id not the client id, check the Javadoc.
FacesMessages.instance().addToControl and Datatable do not work
properly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-1855
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1855
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JSF
Affects Versions: 1.2.0.GA
Reporter: Andy Bosch
Assigned To: Pete Muir
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.0.0.CR1
It is possible do add FacesMessages via the Seam functionality with
FacesMessages.instance().addToControl. In the parameters you have to pass the component
id. In the plain JSF way, you can add FacesMessages via FacesContext ... addMessage. In
the JSF-way you have to pass the client-id.
With normal input components you can use both ways. But when you work with datatables,
you MUST work with the client-id, the Seam-way with using only the component-id does NOT
work.
Explanation: When using a datatable-tag, you only have one component. The renderer
generates the various rows. In the component-tree there is yet only one component! If you
want to add a FacesMessage to one row, you can only work with client-ids (because you have
to include the row-index).
My wish: Please change FacesMessages.instance().addToControl. for using with client-ids.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira