]
Marek Schmidt updated JBSEAM-5001:
----------------------------------
Steps to Reproduce:
1. deploy the attached JBSEAM-5001.ear
2. run the attached "test.py" in Python2
Deadlock between SFSB EJB lock and Component.getInstanceFromFactory
factoryLock calling factory from the same component
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-5001
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBSEAM-5001
Project: Seam 2
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core
Affects Versions: 2.3.0.BETA2
Environment: JBoss AS 7.1.2, Seam 2.3.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT r14986
Reporter: Marek Schmidt
Assignee: Marek Novotny
Fix For: 2.3.0.CR1
Attachments: JBSEAM-5001.ear, JBSEAM-5001.tar.gz, test.py
The following sample demonstrates a deadlock between SFSB lock and the
Component.getInstanceFromFactory factoryLock:
{code}
@Stateful
@Scope(ScopeType.SESSION)
@Name("test")
public class TestAction implements Test
{
public String test() {
Thread.sleep(500);
Component.getInstance("testString", true);
return "test";
}
@Factory(value="testString", scope=ScopeType.SESSION)
public String getTestString() {
return "testString";
}
@Remove
public void remove() {}
}
{code}
when test.xhtml contains:
{code}
<h:outputText value="#{test.test()} " />
{code}
and othertest.xhtml contains:
{code}
<h:outputText value="#{testString} " />
{code}
If the othertest.seam is requested just after (<500ms after) the test.seam with the
same session cookie.
The problem seems to be that the #{test.test()} first locks the TestAction SFSB lock and
then the Seam factory lock in the Component.getInstance call, while #{testString} locks
the factoryLock first.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: