[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMWICKET-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu...
]
Ondrej Zizka updated SEAMWICKET-40:
-----------------------------------
Description:
Sometimes, you may need a standalone (Java SE) application, with an optional web module.
For project which are (for any reason, e.g. historically) not based on an app server, you
would need a weld-se-core for the core.
weld-se-core can't co-exist with weld-servlet-core because they are different impl of
the same API.
However, seam-wicket silently relies on having weld-servlet-core, at least to support
RequestContext.
I suggest to make this need
1) explicitly stated in POM,
2) optional.
To make it optional, it's enough to make this block
{code}
if( conversation.isActive() ){ ... }
{code}
in SeamRequestCycleProcessor's response() optional, because without active
RequestContext, it fails.
Also, and that would be for another jira, I suggest to modify weld-servlet-core to detect
presence of weld-se-core, and use it's WeldContainer instead of bootstraping a new
one.
was:
Sometimes, you may need a standalone (Java SE) application, with an optional web module.
For project which are (for any reason, e.g. historically) not based on an app server, you
would need a weld-se-core for the core.
weld-se-core can't co-exist with weld-servlet-core because they are different impl of
the same API.
However, seam-wicket silently relies on having weld-servlet-core, at least to support
RequestContext.
I suggest to make this need
1) explicitly stated in POM,
2) optional.
To make it optional, it's enough to make this block
{code}
if( conversation.isActive() ){ ... }
{code}
in SeamRequestCycleProcessor's response() optional, because without active
RequestContext, it fails.
Make dependency on weld-servlet-core truly optional
---------------------------------------------------
Key: SEAMWICKET-40
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMWICKET-40
Project: Seam for Apache Wicket
Issue Type: Enhancement
Affects Versions: 3.0.0.Final
Environment: An app with weld-se-core and embedded container (like embedded
Jetty) running servlet/filter based web app.
Reporter: Ondrej Zizka
Sometimes, you may need a standalone (Java SE) application, with an optional web module.
For project which are (for any reason, e.g. historically) not based on an app server, you
would need a weld-se-core for the core.
weld-se-core can't co-exist with weld-servlet-core because they are different impl of
the same API.
However, seam-wicket silently relies on having weld-servlet-core, at least to support
RequestContext.
I suggest to make this need
1) explicitly stated in POM,
2) optional.
To make it optional, it's enough to make this block
{code}
if( conversation.isActive() ){ ... }
{code}
in SeamRequestCycleProcessor's response() optional, because without active
RequestContext, it fails.
Also, and that would be for another jira, I suggest to modify weld-servlet-core to detect
presence of weld-se-core, and use it's WeldContainer instead of bootstraping a new
one.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira