txs Pete!
We should also fix the example in the Spec 9.2 (and maybe others).
LieGrue,
strub
--- Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> schrieb am Mi, 2.12.2009:
Von: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Betreff: Re: [weld-dev] Do interceptor methods need to declare an Exception to be
thrown?
An: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
CC: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Datum: Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009, 12:16
Correct, please file a CDITCK issue!
On 2 Dec 2009, at 11:03, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Somewhere in the back of my brain, I remember that
>
> @AroundInvoke
> public void dingsBums(InvocationContext ivc) throws
Exception;
>
> MUST declare the 'throws Exception', otherwise it's
illegal.
>
> Am I right, or is my brain tricking me?
>
> If the Exception is mandatory, the TCK needs to be
changed:
>
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.KokkolaInterceptor
> (and maybe others)
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen
herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
>
http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen
Massenmails.