On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Gavin King <gavin(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
I've had a few discussions with a certain EE vendor who is
concerned
that the use of the "Bean" terminology sends the message that Web
Beans is a separate component model that competes with EJB. I don't
necessarily agree, but I can see why some people might get that
impression. Whatever: on this issue I think we should do whatever is
necessary to make 299 palatable to all the vendors in the space.
As long as the specs don't become JSR 299: Injectable Types ;-)
Could the term "Managed" or "Contextual" be applied instead? Although
a session bean is automagically a session bean
in WB it looks like no value has been added at all. "Managed session
bean"? "Contextual session bean"?
Are singleton beans also classified as "session beans" BTW?
Nik