Re: [weld-dev] TCK 1.0.1 test results

Yes, the ootb settings are not generous enough, I already adjusted them some, but perhaps we need to increase them more. Jozef, could you try with Martin's settings? If they work, I will update the tag, zips and trunk with this. On 22 Feb 2010, at 15:44, Martin Gencur wrote: > I ran the CDI-TCK test bundle and results are following: > > Tests run: 835, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > 2,039.701 sec :) > > Maybe it was because I used these parameters: > org.jboss.testharness.container.bootTimeout=960000 > org.jboss.testharness.container.shutdownDelay=60000 > max.deployments.restart = 25 > > > Martin > > > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 15:55 +0100, Jozef Hartinger wrote: >> I created the following issues: >> - Interceptors spec audit and coverage report missing in the >> distribution https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-115 >> - Typo in dd-override-report.txt >> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-116 >> - release-notes.txt empty https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-117 >> - JBoss maven repository declaration is missing >> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-118 >> - Documentation issues https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-119 >> >> Furthermore, I was not able to get a clean TCK run against JBoss AS 6 M2 >> (with updated Weld) in my environment - I am getting 100+ failures >> although nightly build seems OK in hudson. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev