I ran the CDI-TCK test bundle and results are following: Tests run: 835, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2,039.701 sec :) Maybe it was because I used these parameters: org.jboss.testharness.container.bootTimeout=960000 org.jboss.testharness.container.shutdownDelay=60000 max.deployments.restart = 25 Martin On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 15:55 +0100, Jozef Hartinger wrote: > I created the following issues: > - Interceptors spec audit and coverage report missing in the > distribution https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-115 > - Typo in dd-override-report.txt > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-116 > - release-notes.txt empty https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-117 > - JBoss maven repository declaration is missing > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-118 > - Documentation issues https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-119 > > Furthermore, I was not able to get a clean TCK run against JBoss AS 6 M2 > (with updated Weld) in my environment - I am getting 100+ failures > although nightly build seems OK in hudson. > _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

With Martin's settings I am not able to get rid of OutOfMemoryError. I tried even more generous settings (2GB heap and 1GB PermSize) with no luck. On 02/22/2010 06:10 PM, Pete Muir wrote: > Yes, the ootb settings are not generous enough, I already adjusted them some, but perhaps we need to increase them more. Jozef, could you try with Martin's settings? If they work, I will update the tag, zips and trunk with this. > > On 22 Feb 2010, at 15:44, Martin Gencur wrote: > >> I ran the CDI-TCK test bundle and results are following: >> >> Tests run: 835, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >> 2,039.701 sec :) >> >> Maybe it was because I used these parameters: >> org.jboss.testharness.container.bootTimeout=960000 >> org.jboss.testharness.container.shutdownDelay=60000 >> max.deployments.restart = 25 >> >> >> Martin >> >> >> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 15:55 +0100, Jozef Hartinger wrote: >>> I created the following issues: >>> - Interceptors spec audit and coverage report missing in the >>> distribution https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-115 >>> - Typo in dd-override-report.txt >>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-116 >>> - release-notes.txt empty https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-117 >>> - JBoss maven repository declaration is missing >>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-118 >>> - Documentation issues https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-119 >>> >>> Furthermore, I was not able to get a clean TCK run against JBoss AS 6 M2 >>> (with updated Weld) in my environment - I am getting 100+ failures >>> although nightly build seems OK in hudson. >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> weld-dev mailing list >> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

Furthermore, I was not able to get a clean TCK run against JBoss AS 6 M2 (with updated Weld) in my environment - I am getting 100+ failures although nightly build seems OK in hudson.

Thanks Jozef. None of these are blockers (except that JBoss Maven repo issue, which we will note in the release notes). On 22 Feb 2010, at 14:55, Jozef Hartinger wrote: > I created the following issues: > - Interceptors spec audit and coverage report missing in the > distribution https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-115 > - Typo in dd-override-report.txt > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-116 > - release-notes.txt empty https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-117 > - JBoss maven repository declaration is missing > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-118 > - Documentation issues https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-119 > > Furthermore, I was not able to get a clean TCK run against JBoss AS 6 M2 > (with updated Weld) in my environment - I am getting 100+ failures > although nightly build seems OK in hudson. > > -- > Jozef Hartinger > Seam QA Engineer > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Martin Gencur <mgencur(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: I'm adding my part of testing: Weld documentation is OK except this small (optional) bug: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-449 Corrected. Though I'm not sure what the fix version should be. -Dan -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev