OH come on. Can't you be more creative than that, it's the weekend after
all? It's like being trapped in a jail cell, the JVM, and you'll never
break free until you break the rules somehow. We need some kind of
advantage over the other groups:
what kind of an elevation is OOP or AOP really when you consider invisible
dimensions? there's gotta be something else lurking invisibly somewhere...
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com> wrote:
OK, great. I've just decided to break the rules and say that up
is
down. You should all be lying on the ceiling by now.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Arbi Sookazian <asookazian(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> don't you hate the rules? it was an interesting question... break the
> rules.
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Eh? By definition you can't do anything with the type system at
*runtime*!
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Would it be doable to use e.g. Javassist to transform a class into one
>> > of those static typesafe "entity classes" at runtime?
>> >
>> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Arbi Sookazian <asookazian(a)gmail.com
>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Looks like there are two tables (users and permissions) but
>> >> testQuery2() and
>> >> testQuery3() both select only from one table - users. So now we need
a
>> >> small db schema (i.e. data model). The typical customers and orders
>> >> would
>> >> suffice to demo FK and potential outer joins. How can I define
>> >> customerId
>> >> as a FK on orders table? Ideally, it would be nice to be able to do
>> >> all
>> >> this via tooling (i.e. exec a wizard that would generate the code for
>> >> us).
>> >> But we need to be able to do all this via the API for now...
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Gavin King
<gavin.king(a)gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> New rev, with ability to pass SQL as strings.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Gavin King
<gavin.king(a)gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > Latest, with a new approach to specifying types.
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Gavin King
>> >>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com
>> >>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> >>>
http://hibernate.org
>> >>>
http://seamframework.org
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> weld-dev mailing list
>> >>> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> weld-dev mailing list
>> >> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ---
>> > Nik
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com
>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>
http://hibernate.org
>>
http://seamframework.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org