Re: [weld-dev] [seam-dev] Move weld-wicket to seam-wicket?
Yes, IMO this was blurring that line and moving it will make the line a bit sharper.
On 16 Apr 2010, at 15:55, Clint Popetz wrote:
It's fine with me; I've never understood the line between
weld and
seam3 anyway :)
-Clint
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since we've started developing Seam 3, I've started to think that the Wicket
support is a better fit for Seam rather than Weld. Most of the Weld sub projects handle
integrating Weld into other environments (such as Java SE) or provide support for using
Weld (e.g. Weld extensions, archetypes).
>
> There wasn't a consensus in our meeting yesterday, so I wanted to open it up for
discussion.
>
> Pete
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
--
Clint Popetz
http://42lines.net
Scalable Web Application Development