Hi all, Since we've started developing Seam 3, I've started to think that the Wicket support is a better fit for Seam rather than Weld. Most of the Weld sub projects handle integrating Weld into other environments (such as Java SE) or provide support for using Weld (e.g. Weld extensions, archetypes). There wasn't a consensus in our meeting yesterday, so I wanted to open it up for discussion. Pete _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

Yes, IMO this was blurring that line and moving it will make the line a bit sharper. On 16 Apr 2010, at 15:55, Clint Popetz wrote: > It's fine with me; I've never understood the line between weld and > seam3 anyway :) > > -Clint > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Since we've started developing Seam 3, I've started to think that the Wicket support is a better fit for Seam rather than Weld. Most of the Weld sub projects handle integrating Weld into other environments (such as Java SE) or provide support for using Weld (e.g. Weld extensions, archetypes). >> >> There wasn't a consensus in our meeting yesterday, so I wanted to open it up for discussion. >> >> Pete >> _______________________________________________ >> seam-dev mailing list >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> > > > > -- > Clint Popetz > http://42lines.net > Scalable Web Application Development _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev