Re: [weld-dev] interceptors in Java SE

Peter Royle wrote: > I've just added some SE unit tests for interceptors and I can't get them > to work, but it could well be a configuration issue or me just being > daft. Could someone take a look please and let me know if I'm missing > something? http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/weld/?cs=5100 > > Done. The interceptor definitions were wrong (i.e. non-compliant with the specification), therefore were not invoked. We issue a warning on such methods, but from the wording it is not clear that they aren't actually treated as interceptor methods (TODO).

> Thanks. > > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:40 +0100, Pete Muir wrote: > >> Yes it should work :-) >> >> Any contrary evidence? >> >> On 17 Nov 2009, at 09:27, Peter Royle wrote: >> >> >>> Not officially just because it hasn't been tried yet. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 01:15 -0500, Gavin King wrote: >>> >>>> What about decorators? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Does the Java SE extension support interceptors? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Gavin King >>>>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com >>>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin >>>>> http://hibernate.org >>>>> http://seamframework.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> weld-dev mailing list >>> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev