Does the Java SE extension support interceptors? -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org

Not officially just because it hasn't been tried yet. On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 01:15 -0500, Gavin King wrote: > What about decorators? > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> Does the Java SE extension support interceptors? >> >> -- >> Gavin King >> gavin.king(a)gmail.com >> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin >> http://hibernate.org >> http://seamframework.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

I've just added some SE unit tests for interceptors and I can't get them to work, but it could well be a configuration issue or me just being daft. Could someone take a look please and let me know if I'm missing something? http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/weld/?cs=5100 Thanks. On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:40 +0100, Pete Muir wrote: > Yes it should work :-) > > Any contrary evidence? > > On 17 Nov 2009, at 09:27, Peter Royle wrote: > > >> Not officially just because it hasn't been tried yet. >> >> >> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 01:15 -0500, Gavin King wrote: >> >>> What about decorators? >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Does the Java SE extension support interceptors? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Gavin King >>>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com >>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin >>>> http://hibernate.org >>>> http://seamframework.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> weld-dev mailing list >> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >> _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

Peter Royle wrote: > I've just added some SE unit tests for interceptors and I can't get > them > to work, but it could well be a configuration issue or me just being > daft. Could someone take a look please and let me know if I'm missing > something? http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/weld/?cs=5100 > > Done. The interceptor definitions were wrong (i.e. non-compliant with the specification), therefore were not invoked. We issue a warning on such methods, but from the wording it is not clear that they aren't actually treated as interceptor methods (TODO). > Thanks. > > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:40 +0100, Pete Muir wrote: > >> Yes it should work :-) >> >> Any contrary evidence? >> >> On 17 Nov 2009, at 09:27, Peter Royle wrote: >> >> >>> Not officially just because it hasn't been tried yet. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 01:15 -0500, Gavin King wrote: >>> >>>> What about decorators? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Gavin King >>>> <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Does the Java SE extension support interceptors? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Gavin King >>>>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com >>>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin >>>>> http://hibernate.org >>>>> http://seamframework.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> weld-dev mailing list >>> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

On 20/11/2009, at 3:56 AM, Marius Bogoevici wrote: > Peter Royle wrote: >> I've just added some SE unit tests for interceptors and I can't get them >> to work, but it could well be a configuration issue or me just being >> daft. Could someone take a look please and let me know if I'm missing >> something? http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/weld/?cs=5100 >> >> > Done. The interceptor definitions were wrong (i.e. non-compliant with > the specification), therefore were not invoked. We issue a warning on > such methods, but from the wording it is not clear that they aren't > actually treated as interceptor methods (TODO). Thanks Marius, much appreciated. >> Thanks. >> >> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 14:40 +0100, Pete Muir wrote: >> >>> Yes it should work :-) >>> >>> Any contrary evidence? >>> >>> On 17 Nov 2009, at 09:27, Peter Royle wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Not officially just because it hasn't been tried yet. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 01:15 -0500, Gavin King wrote: >>>> >>>>> What about decorators? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Does the Java SE extension support interceptors? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Gavin King >>>>>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com >>>>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin >>>>>> http://hibernate.org >>>>>> http://seamframework.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> weld-dev mailing list >>>> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >>>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> weld-dev mailing list >> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev