3:05 p.m.
Great. Okay, just so that I am explaining this right in my talk, if
@Resource and family are on an EJB the EJB container does the injection, but
if the are on a managed bean (i.e., simple bean) then CDI does the
injection. Is that correct?
- Dan Allen
Sent from my Android-powered phone:
An open platform for carriers, consumers
and developers.
On Nov 30, 2009 6:38 AM, "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
It does :-)
We even have a test!
On 27 Nov 2009, at 15:01, Gavin King wrote: > Pete, does this work in, say,
Tomcat: > > @Resour...
3:12 p.m.
New subject: Resource declarations outside Java EE
CDI doesn't do anything. The "container" whatever it is does all
injection. Why is the internal impl of the container interesting to
the user?
P.S. IMO, the spec more or less requires that the "EJB container",
whatever that is, delegates back to the CDI InjectionTarget for all
injection. So the sanest impl is to have the CDI impl do all
injection. But these are details of no concern to the user.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Great. Okay, just so that I am explaining this right in my talk, if
@Resource and family are on an EJB the EJB container does the
injection, but if the are on a managed bean (i.e., simple bean) then
CDI does the injection. Is that correct?
- Dan Allen
Sent from my Android-powered phone:
An open platform for carriers, consumers
and developers.
> On Nov 30, 2009 6:38 AM, "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> It does :-)
>
> We even have a test!
> On 27 Nov 2009, at 15:01, Gavin King wrote: > Pete, does this work
> in, say, Tomcat: > > @Resour...
>
5:49 p.m.
New subject: Resource declarations outside Java EE
Right, but as far as I understand (and from personal experience) servlet
containers don't honor @Resource and family. This is why I hate these
servlet containers, because people notice these magic features don't work
and so they seek out a container (like Spring) to solve their problem
(inject a datasource for instance). So while the developer shouldn't be
concerned, they need to be reassured that w/ Weld in a servlet container,
they are going to get these injections, putting the onus on Weld to provide
them.
(Frankly, servlet containers really muddy our message. But I also appreciate
their simplicity and convenience.)
- Dan Allen
Sent from my Android-powered phone:
An open platform for carriers, consumers
and developers.
On Nov 30, 2009 4:12 PM, "Gavin King" <gavin.king(a)gmail.com> wrote:
CDI doesn't do anything. The "container" whatever it is does all injection.
Why is the internal impl of the container interesting to the user?
P.S. IMO, the spec more or less requires that the "EJB container", whatever
that is, delegates back to the CDI InjectionTarget for all injection. So the
sanest impl is to have the CDI impl do all injection. But these are details
of no concern to the user.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote: >
Great. Okay, just so that...
5505
days inactive
5505
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Dan Allen -
Gavin King