1:06 p.m.
Here's PFD2, please take a look and let me know if there are any
showstopping reasons why I should not go ahead and submit this to the
JCP. Thanks!
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
1:20 p.m.
New subject: [webbeans-dev] [jsr-299-eg] PFD2
Gavin King wrote:
Here's PFD2, please take a look and let me know if there are any
showstopping reasons why I should not go ahead and submit this to the
JCP. Thanks!
As I mentioned before, I don't like the way 3.1.1 is phrased, but we can
fix that for the final release.
On the other hand, InterceptorBinding must be fixed now: it's not in the
javax.interceptor package. It should go in javax.enterprise.inject.
--Roberto
1:31 p.m.
New subject: [webbeans-dev] [jsr-299-eg] PFD2
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Roberto Chinnici
<Roberto.Chinnici(a)sun.com> wrote:
As I mentioned before, I don't like the way 3.1.1 is phrased, but
we can fix
that for the final release.
Fine, re-write it then.
On the other hand, InterceptorBinding must be fixed now: it's not
in the
javax.interceptor package. It should go in javax.enterprise.inject.
I think that's just nuts. It's future is in the interceptors spec. I
don't want to make this change.
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
1:49 p.m.
New subject: [webbeans-dev] [jsr-299-eg] PFD2
+1. I agree with Gavin that the best place for the interceptor binding
is in javax.interceptor.
Cheers,
Reza
Gavin King wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Roberto Chinnici
<Roberto.Chinnici(a)sun.com> wrote:
> As I mentioned before, I don't like the way 3.1.1 is phrased, but we can fix
> that for the final release.
>
Fine, re-write it then.
> On the other hand, InterceptorBinding must be fixed now: it's not in the
> javax.interceptor package. It should go in javax.enterprise.inject.
>
I think that's just nuts. It's future is in the interceptors spec. I
don't want to make this change.
4:05 p.m.
New subject: [webbeans-dev] [jsr-299-eg] PFD2
Gavin King wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Roberto Chinnici
<Roberto.Chinnici(a)sun.com> wrote:
> On the other hand, InterceptorBinding must be fixed now: it's not in the
> javax.interceptor package. It should go in javax.enterprise.inject.
>
I think that's just nuts. It's future is in the interceptors spec. I
don't want to make this change.
Well, its present is in 299. That's where it needs to be.
4:09 p.m.
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/JSR299ProposedFinalDraft2
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Here's PFD2, please take a look and let me know if there are any
showstopping reasons why I should not go ahead and submit this to the
JCP. Thanks!
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
5345
days inactive
5352
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Gavin King -
Reza Rahman -
Roberto Chinnici