OK folks, here's a new draft with the following changes: major changes: * moved TypeLiteral/AnnotationLiteral/Nonbinding to javax.enterprise.util * @Decorates -> @Inject @Delegate * added note to 11.3.18 about classes with component defining annotations minor changes: * light reorg/rewrite of 5.1-5.3, 8.3-8.4, 9.5 (should not have changed any semantics) * fixed a bug in 8.3 * re-added a restriction to 9.3 that got lost at some point * moved exceptions section to 2.8 and removed lots of forward links * moved def of injectable references to 6.5.5-6.5.6 * removed appendices, now that the javadoc is almost ready I got the spec back down to 99 pages now :-) -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org

Apologies, but it looks like I have to take back my previous request for app client support. It seems that there are enough issues related to 299 in the Java EE RI to keep out engineers busy until code freeze. They also told me they expect more Weld code drops in the coming days and they need to work on integrating them. I think we should defer app client support to the next release, alongside static injection. It's simply not high enough in priority to cause the entire release to slip. So please roll back the change you made to 12.1. I'll figure out what I need to add to the platform spec to further clarify that 299 support in the app client is not required. --Roberto Gavin King wrote: > > Another rev, with support for app client jars added in, as requested. > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> OK folks, here's a new draft with the following changes: >> >> major changes: >> >> * moved TypeLiteral/AnnotationLiteral/Nonbinding to javax.enterprise.util >> * @Decorates -> @Inject @Delegate >> * added note to 11.3.18 about classes with component defining annotations >> >> minor changes: >> >> * light reorg/rewrite of 5.1-5.3, 8.3-8.4, 9.5 (should not have >> changed any semantics) >> * fixed a bug in 8.3 >> * re-added a restriction to 9.3 that got lost at some point >> * moved exceptions section to 2.8 and removed lots of forward links >> * moved def of injectable references to 6.5.5-6.5.6 >> * removed appendices, now that the javadoc is almost ready >> >> I got the spec back down to 99 pages now :-) >> >> >> -- >> Gavin King >> gavin.king(a)gmail.com >> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin >> http://hibernate.org >> http://seamframework.org >> >> > > > >

I might just add a note that containers are not required to support app client jar bean deployment archives, making it, essentially, an optional feature. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Roberto Chinnici <Roberto.Chinnici(a)sun.com&gt; wrote: > Apologies, but it looks like I have to take back my previous request for app > client support. > > It seems that there are enough issues related to 299 in the Java EE RI to > keep out engineers busy until code freeze. They also told me they expect > more Weld code drops in the coming days and they need to work on integrating > them. > > I think we should defer app client support to the next release, alongside > static injection. It's simply not high enough in priority to cause the > entire release to slip. > > So please roll back the change you made to 12.1. I'll figure out what I need > to add to the platform spec to further clarify that 299 support in the app > client is not required. > > --Roberto > > Gavin King wrote: >> >> Another rev, with support for app client jars added in, as requested. >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> >>> OK folks, here's a new draft with the following changes: >>> >>> major changes: >>> >>> * moved TypeLiteral/AnnotationLiteral/Nonbinding to javax.enterprise.util >>> * @Decorates -> @Inject @Delegate >>> * added note to 11.3.18 about classes with component defining annotations >>> >>> minor changes: >>> >>> * light reorg/rewrite of 5.1-5.3, 8.3-8.4, 9.5 (should not have >>> changed any semantics) >>> * fixed a bug in 8.3 >>> * re-added a restriction to 9.3 that got lost at some point >>> * moved exceptions section to 2.8 and removed lots of forward links >>> * moved def of injectable references to 6.5.5-6.5.6 >>> * removed appendices, now that the javadoc is almost ready >>> >>> I got the spec back down to 99 pages now :-) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Gavin King >>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com >>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin >>> http://hibernate.org >>> http://seamframework.org >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org

Oh Man this is close 99 pages.... Please keep it under 100 :-) -Jay On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > OK then, here's the latest, with app client jar support optional, and > some clarification to container lifecycle event observers. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > I might just add a note that containers are not required to support > > app client jar bean deployment archives, making it, essentially, an > > optional feature. > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Roberto Chinnici > > <Roberto.Chinnici(a)sun.com&gt; wrote: > >> Apologies, but it looks like I have to take back my previous request > >> for app > >> client support. > >> > >> It seems that there are enough issues related to 299 in the Java EE RI > >> to > >> keep out engineers busy until code freeze. They also told me they > >> expect > >> more Weld code drops in the coming days and they need to work on > >> integrating > >> them. > >> > >> I think we should defer app client support to the next release, > >> alongside > >> static injection. It's simply not high enough in priority to cause the > >> entire release to slip. > >> > >> So please roll back the change you made to 12.1. I'll figure out what I > >> need > >> to add to the platform spec to further clarify that 299 support in the > >> app > >> client is not required. > >> > >> --Roberto > >> > >> Gavin King wrote: > >>> > >>> Another rev, with support for app client jars added in, as requested. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> OK folks, here's a new draft with the following changes: > >>>> > >>>> major changes: > >>>> > >>>> * moved TypeLiteral/AnnotationLiteral/Nonbinding to > >>>> javax.enterprise.util > >>>> * @Decorates -> @Inject @Delegate > >>>> * added note to 11.3.18 about classes with component defining > >>>> annotations > >>>> > >>>> minor changes: > >>>> > >>>> * light reorg/rewrite of 5.1-5.3, 8.3-8.4, 9.5 (should not have > >>>> changed any semantics) > >>>> * fixed a bug in 8.3 > >>>> * re-added a restriction to 9.3 that got lost at some point > >>>> * moved exceptions section to 2.8 and removed lots of forward links > >>>> * moved def of injectable references to 6.5.5-6.5.6 > >>>> * removed appendices, now that the javadoc is almost ready > >>>> > >>>> I got the spec back down to 99 pages now :-) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Gavin King > >>>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com > >>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin > >>>> http://hibernate.org > >>>> http://seamframework.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Gavin King > > gavin.king(a)gmail.com > > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin > > http://hibernate.org > > http://seamframework.org > > > > > > -- > Gavin King > gavin.king(a)gmail.com > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin > http://hibernate.org > http://seamframework.org > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev -- blog: http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay