Dne 15.5.2017 v 20:44 George Gastaldi napsal(a):
Cool!
Question: What's the reason why Weld-core-impl depends on
jboss-interceptors-api_1.2_spec and jboss-el-api_3.0_spec given that
cdi-api:2.0 already brings javax.incerceptor.api:1.2 and
javax.el-api:3.0.0 as transitive dependencies?
Well, it's always been like this. In EE users don't depend on Weld at
all. In SE users usually bring in weld-se directly (depends on Weld core
and Weld API - depends on cdi-api with exclusions
https://github.com/weld/api/blob/master/pom.xml#L190) and explicit
cdi-api dependency is not needed.
But the truth is we should probably revisit this since users can now
depend on cdi-api and use CDI bootstrap API, ie. bring weld only as an
impl dependency.
PS: Just upgraded Furnace to use Weld 3.0.0.Final and all tests are
passing. Great job!
That's great ;-)
Best Regards,
George Gastaldi
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat <
https://www.redhat.com>
Remote
Joinville - Santa Catarina
ggastald(a)redhat.com <mailto:ggastald@redhat.com> M: +55-47-99711-1000
<tel:+55-47-99711-1000>
<
https://red.ht/sig>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <
https://redhat.com/trusted>
@redhatnews <
https://twitter.com/redhatnews> Red Hat
<
https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat
<
https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:30 AM, Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com
<mailto:mkouba@redhat.com>> wrote:
http://weld.cdi-spec.org/news/2017/05/15/weld-300Final/
<
http://weld.cdi-spec.org/news/2017/05/15/weld-300Final/>
--
Martin Kouba
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev>
--
Martin Kouba
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic