Yes, we aren't adding this method :-)
On 13 Jan 2009, at 21:29, Benjamin Graf wrote:
Well, I agree with Gavin. I don't see any additional benefit over
the
current approach with proxytesting the injection point types.
Benjamin
Marcell Manfrin Barbacena schrieb:
> +1. But it shouldn't throw exception because the method returns a
> boolean.
>
> []s
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Gavin King <gavin(a)hibernate.org>
> wrote:
>
>> No, it just inspects the API type of the injection point and applies
>> the rules. It does not even need to know the actual implementation
>> class.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think that Bean needs an isProxyable() method to allow
>>> Manager.validate()
>>> to check whether a bean in a normal scope can be proxied, and if
>>> not throw
>>> the UnproxyableDependencyException.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>>> webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com
>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>
http://hibernate.org
>>
http://seamframework.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>> webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
webbeans-dev mailing list
webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev