Yes, that test is basically why I'm asking the question. Also, if I am
using implicit bean archives (per the CDI spec, the system flag) and have
flat deploymnet mode in Weld, what bean discovery should I be seeing? The
result of the merged beans.xml?
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:16 AM Matej Novotny <manovotn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Actually, now that I think of it I was wrong.
You may have a set of JARs in your deployment and you don't want to pick
up beans from all JARs (it might even lead to ambiguous dep for example).
Therefore, beans.xml, even empty one, would be required to mark an archive
which is to be considered a bean archive.
I also found this test which can be easily fiddled with to verify what I
said above -
E.g. if you change `bda1` to be a JavaArchive (no beans.xml added), it
will fail with unsatisfied dep.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matej Novotny" <manovotn(a)redhat.com>
> To: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>
> Cc: "Weld" <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 8:04:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Flat Deployment mode & beans.xml
> Hi John,
> what you say makes sense, there shouldn't be need for multiple beans.xml.
> Does it give you any errors?
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>
> > To: "Weld" <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 4:17:35 PM
> > Subject: [weld-dev] Flat Deployment mode & beans.xml
> > Hi,
> > If I'm using Weld SE in a flat deployment mode, is a beans.xml required
> > still
> > in all JARs? I would assume that with the beans.xml's being merged,
> > that didn't have a beans.xml would inherit the "merged" one.
> > John
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> weld-dev mailing list