Not sure if there is actually a benefit for the user if the implementation
of the server is done w/ pure netty, or w/ netty+vert.x on-top
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
+1
The vert.x version could also be cool
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> currently we have the UPS server _and_ the SimplePush server on on
>> cartridge.
>>
>> Since the UPS now is a full profile dependent server (JMS/HornetQ) is
>> on, I'd like to change remove the SimplePush Server from the cartridge.
>>
>> For SimplePush, IMO it's best to have a standalone cartridge, that just
>> is Java based and fire up the Netty based server - no WildFly really
>> needed, just MySQL and the SimplePush server
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Passos
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev