Re: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear.org - a first thought on changing our roadmap docs

First step: replace existing roadmaps with links to JIRAs, where possible.

Next step: re-think the entire roadmaps section. I am currently on that, and it's not 100% yet clear, what's best. Once I have more on this, I will share thoughts

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Bruno Oliveira < bruno(a)abstractj.org > wrote: > > Speaking from the security side of the things, to me is impossible to > have a feature driven roadmap, because it's a cross cutting concern. > right :-) looking at [1] I see different types of roadmaps 1) Project roadmap 2) Platform roadmaps (e.g. Android, Cordova, iOS and JS) 3) cross cutting concerns (e.g. security) 4) specific roadmaps (E.g. UPS/WebPush or even the WebSite roadmap) And that's fine :) For now, I'd really just like to get rid of the pages that basically duplicate info, available on JIRA :-) > > About removing the roadmap from website, as long as we make it clear > por people outside AeroGear, I'm fine. > > On 2014-12-15, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > Hi team, > > > > while thinking about restructuring our roadmaps, I was wondering about > our > > existing roadmaps on [1]. Overall I'd like to have the AG roadmaps more > > feature driven, but that requires some more thoughts/changes? > > > > However, here is what I am wondering about... > > > > Most of our roadmaps we link to from [1], are really just pointing to > > different JIRAs. > > > > > > Let's take one example, UPS: > > https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/UnifiedPush/ > > > > Basically all info on the above page is present in JIRA (including the > > 'archived' roadmap of older releases). Since JIRA should be the central > > tool for planing releases, features and future versions, I think that our > > roadmap docs are not adding too much value, since they repeat info that > is > > available on a different place (JIRA). > > > > Also, maintaining the roadmaps is tedious: You make a change on the > actual > > JIRA (e.g. move the date of a release or add a new feature). To keep the > > roadmap up-to-date, you put the same info on the roadmap doc and send a > PR. > > > > > > Can we remove these roadmap docs? > > > > For UPS that would mean, that the link on [1] would go against: > > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jir... > > > > instead of here: > > https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/UnifiedPush/ > > > > -Matthias > > > > [1] https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/ > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > -- > > abstractj > PGP: 0x84DC9914 > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

_______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev