Hello Bruno,
thanks for the reply.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>wrote:
Hi Matthias, it should not be enabled by default because that would
hide
some important details from our developers and add too much magic.
+1 I am fine with that, actually
I think is a design choice and I'm open for change if necessary, I just
would like to make sure that our developers are aware of it, since it
has some side effects.
yeah, I am with you there.
*
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/AGSEC-78
*
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security/pull/26
-M
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
> I just see the SecurityInterceptor
> <
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security/blob/master/src/main/java/o...
is
> not included in the beans.xml
> <
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-security/blob/master/src/main/resour...
file
> of the AG-security project.
>
> Should it be included or not ? I can see both ways...
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf