Re: [aerogear-dev] USP 1.1.0 - API change: Status code change for Sender Endpoint

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com <mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote: On 02/03/2015 04:13 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hi, > > I recently noticed that we are (IMO) incorrectly returning 200 (OK): > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/jaxrs... > > Since we really do submit an async job here, and its processing > may not have been started when we do return the 200 (OK), I'd > like to propose a slight change here to instead use 202 (Accepted): > > http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.2.3 > > If the team is OK (ha ha) with this, I will track this in JIRA This should be OK, I will need to review the Android code. I hope no Android code is actually using the SENDER api :-)

Is there any downside to accepting results on the client side? (As opposed to configuring the library comply with a certain version of UPS) Not sure what you are asking here > > -Matthias > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Summers Pittman >>Phone:404 941 4698 >>Java is my crack. _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

>Phone:404 941 4698 >Java is my crack.