For my project i need geofencing features and if only this is well
documented and there is a binary i would love to use it .
It's not (yet) related to the Geo Server but we have a geofencing Cordova
plugin :
Regards
Raj
------------------------------
*From:* Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
*To:* AeroGear Developer Mailing List <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 12:13 AM
*Subject:* Re: [aerogear-dev] [POC] Unified Geo Server
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
wrote:
On 2014-12-15, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
wrote:
> >
> > Good morning, first nice screencast Sebi and even knowing this is just
a
> > PoC I have some considerations:
> >
> > 1. What would be the use case scenario to justify a separated server
> > instead of just a module on AGPUSH?
> >
>
> I think main discussion around this at F2F meeting was, it might be
useful
> for other scenarios as well,
> and we don't want to hard-wire geo to the push server
Which scenarios?
anything else that may require geo data. E.g. other systems may benefit
from interacting with geo as well.
I really do not see a reason why geo is hard-wired to push.
the geo server should be a system to store any sorts of geo data
(long/lat) + some APIs to query.
>
>
>
> >
> > 2. How do you plan to prevent people from faking their location?
> >
>
> I'd assume that a Geo SDK would be based on-top of the mobile OS's
> facility, to receive the long/lat values.
> I think in the future we can have some sort of checks, like validating
the
> users IP address, if it somewhat matches the submitted geo data.
I think Geo based on IPs are a bad idea. This is a very inaccurate method
and should be our last resort, it's easy to spoof IPs.
:-) yeah. I'd assume that we offer minimal/simple SDKs for iOS/Android,
which underneath
leverage the OS facilities for Geo-Data. Like CoreLocation on iOS.
Regarding the IP, I had this in mind (not sure if that is a good idea or
not):
* if long/lat (can be faked with man-in-the-middle) says Germany, but IP
says singapore,
our server could see: something is wrong.
or if we get weird long/lats from the same device (.e.g. 12:00 Germany,
12:30 UK, 14:00 USA, 14:30 China),
we might know something is wrong too. But that's perhaps not for the
initial scope of the poc
>
>
>
> >
> > 3. Do we have a privacy policy to make the developer real aware about
> > what's being collected?
> >
>
> I think that the level of collected geo data is up to the developer of
the
> app, using the Geo SDK.
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. If we don't provide a policy about the
usage of the Geo
server, we're pretty much accountable for it.
Nothing huge, only a simple txt documenting what's being collected and
why.
I'd think that, if we provide an SDK (and the POC will get us there), we
do not really track anything 'silently'.
I hope that the SDK would allow me to get the current position (e.g. using
CoreLocation), and store it with a name (e.g. home, work, my fav. cinema)
and some metadata (e.g. username).
But I'd not imagine our SDK constantly tracks all positions and silently
sends them to the Geo Server.
>
>
> >
> > 4. Will collecting geo location be opt in or default?
> >
>
> If the Geo-data SDK is used w/in an app, I think it will still ask,
> up-front, if location based services are OK to use (at least apple). And
> I'd argue that users can still disable the geo usage, per app (at least
> apple)
Most of users have no idea that their data is being collected. I'm
confused about your answer, is that an yes or no?
I mean yes, see above.
-MAtthias
>
>
>
>
> >
> > 5. Why is necessary to store current user's position?
>
>
> I think that's up to the use case, and its usage of the Geo SDK.
Currently we store. I know this is just a proof of concept.
But I insist to be the boring, and avoid it if possible.
>
>
> > Couldn't admin
> > specify a range and check how many devices are active on that region?
> > Into this way you don't need to store their positions. I'm not the Geo
> > specialist here but the idea is:
> >
> > 1. Admin specify the range when a push message must be sent. For
> > example: Whole Florida
> > 2. Client opt in and sent her its position to the server
> > 3. Server compares and sent the push message
> >
> > I'm very concerned about privacy here, I'm not against the
> > solution, but Geo location is like to open a Pandora box.
> >
>
> yeah, it's also creepy :) I have not much services that I give my geo
data
>
>
> >
> > We might be careful about unintentional disclosure of geolocation
> > information,
> > because it carries physical risks to the client (theft, to stalking,
> > kidnapping
> > and domestic violence — I'm not exaggerating).
> >
>
> +1 I'd argue that the "Geo server" would be, initially, a
'simple' back
> end, that is able to store n pairs of long/lat values (grouped by a
> user/device).
> The mobile SDK for it basically store the 'collected' data to this
backend
> (somewhat similar to the push registration SDK)
>
>
> >
> > Again, I know this is a proof of concept, but sooner we have it in
mind,
> > the
> > better.
> >
>
> +1 fully agree. Replied to your questions with my POV on this
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2014-12-10, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have been working on a POC around geolocation. Like we discussed in
> > > another thread, we decided not to have a "deep" integration with
the
Push
> > > server but instead a separate component / microservice. Well the POC
is
> > > more a miniservice ;)
> > >
> > > So, the idea is to have a server to which devices can register by
> > providing
> > > their positions. On the other side, the server provide an endpoint to
> > make
> > > spatial queries, like give me all the installations within a radius
of 10
> > > km around this lat/ltg.
> > >
> > > Thanks to Forge, I created/scaffolded a really simple server
providing
> > the
> > > registration endpoint and the search endpoint.
> > >
> > > I tried to make a decent readme that will give you more details :
> > >
> > >
https://github.com/sebastienblanc/unified-geo-server
> > >
> > > And as usual, I made a little screencast showing all that in action
;)
> > >
> > >
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-qdLJh4EWQ
> > >
> > > Please remember this is a POC, so the security is almost inexistant,
the
> > > console is awful ;)
> > >
> > > What about the Client SDKs ?
> > >
> > > If we reach some kind of consensus arounf the concept of Unfied Geo
> > Server
> > > we can start building the Client SDKs / POCs , they will be quite
simple
> > :
> > > retrieve geolocation and register to the geo endpoint.
> > >
> > > Sebi
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev