Re: [aerogear-dev] [iOS] Datamanager / AGStore
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Feb 24, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:25:33AM -0600, Kris Borchers wrote:
At the same time, I am leery of leaving it in if iOS and Android don't
have something similar since this feature was not thoroughly
discussed. I would hate to leave this in, only to have to deprecate it
in a later release for something that we decide works better for all
libs.
How do you feel about node.js stability indication on APIs? Perhaps we
could borrow some inspiration there (and this filter API would be
experimental then)
So I like this idea in theory. I have a couple of concerns.
1. We're talking about a specific method here which is a pretty
detailed place to mark something experimental. At the same time, I wouldn't
want to mark all of DataManager as experimental just because of one method.
I agree, just that particular method :)
2) Related to #1, we would then have to go through and give a stability
rating to every method of every piece of AeroGear and maintain that for
every new feature, method, etc.
3) We would need to document our index somewhere similar to
http://nodejs.org/api/documentation.html#documentation_stability_index
that would be nice, but having a doc on that particular function/method
could be fine, for now...
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 3.4 KB)