Re: [aerogear-dev] [Android] - Refactoring OAuth2 configuration

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com <mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote: On 03/09/2015 11:21 AM, Corinne Krych wrote: > As suggested make it part of Social lib then. > I’d love to see some convergence in our oauth libs > > For example: > - why not naming aerogear-android-authz by aerogear-android-oauth2 like all other libs? Because we have multiple JIRA tasks for supporting things other than oauth. Could these 'things other than oauth' live in its own repo? Or is the idea to be modular inside of the authz repo?

> - why not propose a intent based (i.e.: external browser) implementation for android? There's a JIRA for that too. > > ++ > Corinne > >> On 09 Mar 2015, at 16:11, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com <mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> oject hitching our code to the configuration of a third party proprietary system is terrifyingly bad karma. Push is an exception ONLY because there isn't an equvalent open solution which has the same reach to devic > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Summers Pittman >>Phone:404 941 4698 >>Java is my crack. _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

>Phone:404 941 4698 >Java is my crack.