Re: [aerogear-dev] DataSync or SyncPipe API proposal

So iOS and JS are at the same level of API fucntionalities and same method names. we’re just left to pick a name DataSync vs SyncPipe

Let’s see for the Java version ++ Corinne On 10 Feb 2014, at 14:40, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2014, at 6:38 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Hello Guys, >> >> Following discussion on ML thread [1], and JIRA discussion [2] (sorry guys I catched up the discussion late, I wasn’t watching the JIRa ticket so i didn’t get notifications) here is the 2 gists we have: >> 1. DataSync (JS naming) [3] >> 2. SyncPipe(ios naming) [4] >> >> I guess we should call them the same and agree on a name. I like to use ‘pipe’ in the naming just to recall it’s async and going through network. I found DataSync a too generic term which may lead to confusion. This is not the same object that will save data offline and trigger sync. >> >> Main differences are: in iOS one I defined a readAll method. Also for save/update I define a third callbacks ‘conflict’ which take 3 arguments . > > in JS the read method can also be "read all", should probably update that gist > >> >> @summers do you have a gist for java API? >> thoughts? >> >> ++ >> Corinne >> [1] http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-sync-To-pipe-or-no... >> [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1408 >> [3] https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/81de9737b5c91367aa3c >> [4] https://gist.github.com/corinnekrych/8914290 >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev