I think we should also take a look at the "slowly changing dimension " theories
:
In particularly type VI
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le Oct 10, 2012 à 18:38, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> a écrit :
On Oct 10, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Sébastien Blanc wrote:
> Hi,
> Really interesting. I'm also thinking a lot about the data synch process and
I'm glad to see that your ideas are pretty much the same as me.
> But great challenges to come like dealing multiple edits of the same record by
different clients :)
One strategy that I've seen in the wild is having smaller records, (a contact entity
could potentially have a timestamp for each field, to aid during the merge)
I know it's pretty aggressive and wasteful - just food for thought
> About triggering the synch process we could start a POC with the "online"
event on the client side, that could spawn a webwork script taking care of the synch
process.
> On the server side, we have to manage a sort of queue maintaining the state of the
"dirty" records on which the clients can subscribe (and being noticed by push
events , web sockets etc ...) , very exciting stuff to come.
>
> Seb
> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>
> Le Oct 10, 2012 à 17:31, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Just wanted to let you know what I am working on right now. It is very early but
Matthias loves e-mail so I thought I would throw this out there.
>>
>> Basically, right now all I am doing is working on keeping track of the status of
data in DataManager. Assuming a new dataSync setting is set to true, these are the things
I am planning.
>>
>> • New record is added to store, status is set to NEW and a UUID is generated
>> • Record is updated, status is set to MODIFIED
>> • Record is removed, status is set to REMOVED (data is not actually removed,
future will need to keep storage limits in mind)
>> • Add a new sync method that will run through the data and sync with the
server. Assumes client is data of record for now during development until we can determine
a strategy for informing the client how the server tracks data status and how it should be
informed that this data is being synced
>> • This brings us back to the discussion about sending metadata to the
client on first app load. That metadata could inform the client of the sync strategy
>>
>> There's probably more to this but these are my original thoughts right now.
>>
>> Kris
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-- qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev