On 04 Feb 2014, at 09:15, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello iOS folks
I’ve started looking at sync part, I’ve created a separate repo [1]. For now, this lib is
dependant on iOS-core. does is worth having it separate for folks that what to use core
without sync?
yes
Same question applies for encrypted store. Right now encrypted store are part of
iOS-core. do we want to separate it for people who want core without encrypted store ?
I do like the idea of separation
Just for that i’ve created
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGIOS-160
what about people who all it all, encrypted store+sync, we’ll have to manage correctly
transitive dependencies.
could we bundle something like an 'AeroGear-All-You-Can-Eat-iOS' (similar like
something you can do w/ the maven-shade-plugin?). Adding Andrea, perhaps he has an idea on
that
Yep i guess we could have an aerogear-ios repo which gather all you can eat Podspec
aerogear-ios could be renamed aerogear-core-ios. Coiuld be revisited in 2.0+
Track in that JIRA
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGIOS-161
wdty?
++
Corinne
[1]
https://github.com/corinnekrych/aerogear-sync-ios
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev