Re: [aerogear-dev] JIRA instances for Push...

+1 for the same Jira project, and use components -- Passos On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > +1. Less JIRA instances, the better imho. > > Karel > > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 11:32 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > right now we have three different types of 'push servers': > > * UPS > > * SimplePush > > * WebPush Server > > > > > > The first two ones each have their own JIRA, but I was wondering if we > > use the AGPUSH jira for all three. > > > > > > To manage releases and bugs, we will go with different/more > > components, and for the releases, we could do what we do successfully > > on our Cordova project. We can, in JIRA, have releases like: > > > > > > ups-1.3.0 > > sps-1.0.0 > > wps-0.2.0 > > > > > > That way would have all push (server) bits on the same JIRA and > > differentiation is simply done using components and versions as > > discussed above. > > > > > > Any thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev