Re: [aerogear-dev] [feedhenry-dev] AeroGear Github projects

Hi Daniel, I like the idea (I think this is how the docs organization should be driven), how about: As a developer or contributor, I'd like to know what repos are associated with the feature/platform I'm planning to develop for. I think this was the original intention behind the 'Modules' pulldown on aerogear.org which, for example, links to https://aerogear.org/sync/. Unfortunately, the repos <https://github.com/aerogear/?query=sync> link doesn't work as expected for me. (and I'm not sure if changing the link to https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aaerogear+sync is a good solution)

As I've said earlier [1], I find aerogear.org difficult to maintain (it's now a mishmash of html/markdown/asciidoc, with dependencies I seem to have difficulty following [2].

If there isn't an appetite for changing to asciibinder, I can still help reorganize, update and publish documentation, and this seems as good an issue as any to start with. How about doing this collation on the wiki (using asciidoc): https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/wiki

WDYT? Paul [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/feedhenry-dev/2017- December/msg00091.html [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/pull/714 On 01/02/2018 10:08 PM, Daniel Passos wrote: I was thinking about have a project to group the repos with the same feature/platform, but that is not the GH idea. I thought project will give us something like https://github.com/aerogear/ projects/sync and this link will list all sync repos As I sad, nevermind! On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Wei Li <weil(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > You can have GH project per org - https://github.com/orgs/aero > gear/projects. But I don't know why we need it given that we already > have Trello & Jira? > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> Nevermind, >> >> I'd like to create a project to group repos, like: >> >> Project X >> >> aerogear-android-x >> aerogear-ios-x >> >> But, GH do it in a different way. Just realized GH project is per repo >> not per org >> >> My mistake. Sorry about that. >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Paul Wright <pwright(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> can you outline why you think it will help? >>> >>> If there are projects for all platforms and features, won't we end up >>> wrangling projects as well as repos? >>> >>> Note: I'm saying this with true ignorance, I have no idea whether >>> that's true or not ;) >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> On 01/02/2018 05:16 PM, Daniel Passos wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I wanna create some Github projects to help us to organize repos on >>> AeroGear organization. Wdyt? >>> >>> I was thinking about create 2 types of projects: >>> >>> 1. Platforms >>> 2. Features >>> >>> Some examples in my mind: >>> Platforms >>> >>> Android >>> iOS >>> JS >>> Xamarin >>> Cordova >>> Feature >>> >>> Website >>> Core >>> Http >>> Push >>> OAuth2 >>> Database >>> Security >>> Sync >>> >>> PS: A repo can be in more than one project. >>> ​ >>> -- >>> -- Passos >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> feedhenry-dev mailing listfeedhenry-dev@redhat.comhttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Paul Wright >>> Mobile Docs (github: finp) >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -- Passos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> feedhenry-dev mailing list >> feedhenry-dev(a)redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-dev >> >> > > > -- > > WEI LI > > SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER > > Red Hat Mobile <https://www.redhat.com/> > > weil(a)redhat.com M: +353862393272 > <https://red.ht/sig> > -- -- Passos -- Paul Wright Mobile Docs (github: finp)