Re: [aerogear-dev] Github Protected Branches

+1 makes sense to enable this for master and maintenance brances On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > same here. I think perhaps we "just" protect master? > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; > wrote: > >> I feel 50/50 about it, sometimes we have to rebase and fix some mess in >> the Git tree. >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> >>> https://github.com/blog/2051-protected-branches-and-required-status-checks >>> >>> I think this would be good for us to implement >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -- >> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato >> - >> @abstractj >> - >> Volenti Nihil Difficile >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Cheers, Erik Jan