Re: [aerogear-dev] thoughts on merging docs repo on site repo
+1 for merge - the original idea was sound, but the integration is too difficult.
As I mentioned I would want to revisit this in the future.
On Sep 5, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Kris Borchers wrote:
+1 for merge
On Sep 5, 2012, at 5:50 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
> Howdy
>
> I was thinking we should reconsider if it's really paying off to have the two
repos separated - right now it's bringing more problems than solving IMO.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -- qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev