We don't need to show a list for installations. I can see where you
would want to send a message to a handful of installations, just for
testing, so just a small textfield for the Alias makes sense for this.
In case of variants I would suggest checkboxes, as there probably won't
be a great number. The variant names are also more prone to errors (and
our error reporting isn't that great at the moment), using spaces,
capatilisations, etc.
Hylke
On 27/02/2014 19:35, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
O_o
nah..... let's not have a select list for all the devices - that would
be just plain wrong
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com
<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> wrote:
perhaps not, but if we add this to installations, ....
On Feb 27, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
> I doubt that there are a gazillion variants :)
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Lucas Holmquist
> <lholmqui(a)redhat.com <mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> That list of variants to choose from could potentially be
> extremely loooooong
>
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:hbons@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> After some discussion with Sebastien, here's the first
>> iteration of the design:
>>
https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/tests/send-message.png
>>
>> It shows a summary at the end of the form for review, as
>> sending messages can go very badly if a mistake was made in
>> the form. It may look a bit excessive with the different
>> pages, but it's an important case with actions that can't be
>> undone.
>>
>> Let me know your thoughts and whether this is at all possible.
>>
>> Hylke
>>
>>
>> On 26/02/2014 09:15, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> An update : here the latest screenshot of the current UI :
>>>
>>>
>>> And also now you can test it for real since I deployed a
>>> new version that manage the sending : :
>>>
http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com
>>> <
http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com/> (admin /123)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
>>> <matzew(a)apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Sebi,
>>>
>>> that looks really nice!
>>>
>>> Hylke can you take a look at the first version, from a
>>> UX persons view?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Sebastien Blanc
>>> <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com <mailto:scm.blanc@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I started to work on a new "Compose Message" page.
>>> The idea is that you can add criterias to your
>>> message , as you can see here on this screenshot :
>>> compose2
>>>
>>>
>>> I've also deployed a live version but *DICSLAIMER*
>>> this is just UI / Mockup work sending will not work
>>> for now :
http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com
>>> <
http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com/> => Select an
>>> App and you will have a "Copomse Message" link on
>>> the next page.
>>>
>>> Feedback is welcome.
>>> Sebi
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Sebastien Blanc
>>> <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com
<mailto:scm.blanc@gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Hylke Bons
>>> <hbons(a)redhat.com <mailto:hbons@redhat.com>>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Sounds good.
>>> Let me know if you need any help with the
>>> mockup designs. ;)
>>>
>>> Sure, I will ASAP submit a "raw" mockup on
>>> which you can work on.
>>> What I would like is a dedicated page for the
>>> "Compose Push Message" feature.
>>>
>>> We wil have a criteria section to choose to who
>>> we want to send the message. I really like for
>>> instance how Jira do that like here
>>>
http://postimg.org/image/5ur2j9wh5/
>>> In our case we could have the drop downs for :
>>> "Variants", "Device Type",
"Alias" and "Categories"
>>> And then below w will have a free text area to
>>> send a custom value.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hylke
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/02/2014 12:08, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Matthias
>>>> Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org
>>>> <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> over the weekend I spoke w/ a friend:
>>>> His company is doing some mobile
>>>> (iOS/Android) apps which also support
>>>> receiving push notifications.
>>>>
>>>> Two examples he told me. After
>>>> receiving push notification:
>>>>
>>>> * One of their apps basically fetches
>>>> the latest version of a CSV file,
>>>> stored on a public HTTP Server.
>>>>
>>>> * Another app is used to tell sales
>>>> guys new brochure files (PDF) are
>>>> available on a protected resource of a
>>>> webserver (which they _can_ than
>>>> download from w/in the app, if the
>>>> like to)
>>>>
>>>> The company build a simple console
>>>> (PHP) which allows them to send new
>>>> push messages, when ever their
>>>> customers want to.
>>>>
>>>> I showed them our UnifiedPush Server
>>>> and its usage via our AeroDoc example
>>>> (iOS / backend). They really liked the
>>>> UnifiedPush Server. Especially that it
>>>> does store all the device metadata.
>>>>
>>>> But since a lot of their mobile apps
>>>> don't have a backend requirement, they
>>>> would still have to use their own
>>>> console (which than connects to UPS)
>>>> for submitting all the push messages
>>>> they want.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This brings me to [AGPUSH-38] and I
>>>> really think we should implement that
>>>> feature. Not only for sending test
>>>> messages! If our UnifiedPush Server
>>>> allows its users to simple send push
>>>> messages to all of their mobile apps,
>>>> it would make the server even more
>>>> attractive.
>>>>
>>>> I regret a bit that I was against
>>>> [AGPUSH-38] in the beginning, I guess
>>>> that's due to my Java enterprise
>>>> background, where you typically find
>>>> complex setups, and server talk to
>>>> servers :-(
>>>>
>>>> Anyways, now I really think that the
>>>> UPS has to have such a 'send push'
>>>> facility inside of the Admin UI :-) I
>>>> believe that we could reach way more
>>>> potential users with something like that
>>>>
>>>> +9001 and I already started thinking about
>>>> this for a while. I will try to submit
>>>> some mockups/POCs this week so we can
>>>> discuss that and I have quickly a first
>>>> working version on master.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [AGPUSH-38]
>>>>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-38
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog:
>>>>
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions:
>>>>
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev