Re: [aerogear-dev] Current status of UPS 0.11.0

Bom Dia! On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > Good morning peeps, > > First I would like to thank Bill Burke, Stian, Sebastien and Lukas for > dedicating > their time helping with Keycloak integration. > Great to hear! :-) > > I think we are almost done, this is the current branch: > https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak.js. > And now most > of issues were gone and is also possible to display the current logged > in user. > > Now I'm working on fix the sender endpoint, to be more precise we need > to remove the HTTP basic authentication for sending push messages > now that most of the endpoints are protect by Keycloak. Is the reason here that the 'sending endpoint' is also accessed from the AdminUI, for the 'compose a push' feature? If it's really required I am OK with that. However, I'd prefer to avoid it, as changing the behaviour of one of our two HTTP_BASIC endpoints ('device registration' and 'sending') also requires changes/updates on the relevant client SDKs. Greetings, Matthias > If you try to > send a push message based on my branch you will see the basic > authentication form atm. > > If you have a better idea, I'm all ears. > > -- > > abstractj > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev