I did not decide against it,
I've just not had time to revisit this and
thought I'd bring this up for discussion in general about close status
codes.
On 4 June 2013 14:39, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I thought we discussed that you could detect that the connection was
still
active and we wouldn't close it in that case. Did you decide against that?
I can still see situations where we would need to handle a close frame on
the client but I thought we decided to not do it in this case.
On Jun 4, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Simple Push Error codes
I'd like to bring up a question that came up while developing the
SimplePush Server. The server has a scheduled job that will clean up
inactive UserAgents. When it does the clean up, the connection will also be
closed by the server (if it is still active) and an error code with a
message is returned. This will be a SockJS close frame which looks like
this:
c[3039,"Connection closed due to inactivity"]
Now, the status code which is the first entry above is just something I
made up. It might be nice to have a few different error codes to signal to
the client the reason for closing, as the client might want to take some
action. I've not found anything in the SimplePush Protocol
Specification<https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/SimplePush/Protocol> yet,
and thought I bring this up for discussion.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev