7:36 a.m.
It's a good start.
Before designing the actual form, maybe we should take a step back and
think about why we'd want to send a message?
I can think of some cases:
1. Testing whether your newly created app variant and push network
combination work correctly. It's good to have the immediate confirmation
right after you've created a new application variant and have configured
a push network. We could have some kind of test dialogue, which can be
skipped.
2. Debugging network issues and general testing. A fixed message could
do the trick, but people may want to test all kinds of content to a
variety of devices to see if there are any issues.
3. Code generation. Other than sending messages, Sebastien's form looks
like a good way to generate code that the backend can use directly. It
could be a sort of small visual design tool, to make using the UPS even
easier.
There may be more?
Thoughts?
Hylke
On 25/02/2014 09:06, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
Hi,
I started to work on a new "Compose Message" page. The idea is that
you can add criterias to your message , as you can see here on this
screenshot :
compose2
I've also deployed a live version but *DICSLAIMER* this is just UI /
Mockup work sending will not work for now :
http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com => Select an App and you will have a
"Copomse Message" link on the next page.
Feedback is welcome.
Sebi
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com
<mailto:scm.blanc@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com
<mailto:hbons@redhat.com>> wrote:
Sounds good.
Let me know if you need any help with the mockup designs. ;)
Sure, I will ASAP submit a "raw" mockup on which you can work on.
What I would like is a dedicated page for the "Compose Push
Message" feature.
We wil have a criteria section to choose to who we want to send
the message. I really like for instance how Jira do that like here
http://postimg.org/image/5ur2j9wh5/
In our case we could have the drop downs for : "Variants", "Device
Type", "Alias" and "Categories"
And then below w will have a free text area to send a custom value.
Hylke
On 23/02/2014 12:08, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
> <matzew(a)apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> over the weekend I spoke w/ a friend: His company is
> doing some mobile (iOS/Android) apps which also support
> receiving push notifications.
>
> Two examples he told me. After receiving push notification:
>
> * One of their apps basically fetches the latest version
> of a CSV file, stored on a public HTTP Server.
>
> * Another app is used to tell sales guys new brochure
> files (PDF) are available on a protected resource of a
> webserver (which they _can_ than download from w/in the
> app, if the like to)
>
> The company build a simple console (PHP) which allows
> them to send new push messages, when ever their customers
> want to.
>
> I showed them our UnifiedPush Server and its usage via
> our AeroDoc example (iOS / backend). They really liked
> the UnifiedPush Server. Especially that it does store all
> the device metadata.
>
> But since a lot of their mobile apps don't have a backend
> requirement, they would still have to use their own
> console (which than connects to UPS) for submitting all
> the push messages they want.
>
>
>
> This brings me to [AGPUSH-38] and I really think we
> should implement that feature. Not only for sending test
> messages! If our UnifiedPush Server allows its users to
> simple send push messages to all of their mobile apps, it
> would make the server even more attractive.
>
> I regret a bit that I was against [AGPUSH-38] in the
> beginning, I guess that's due to my Java enterprise
> background, where you typically find complex setups, and
> server talk to servers :-(
>
> Anyways, now I really think that the UPS has to have such
> a 'send push' facility inside of the Admin UI :-) I
> believe that we could reach way more potential users with
> something like that
>
> +9001 and I already started thinking about this for a while.
> I will try to submit some mockups/POCs this week so we can
> discuss that and I have quickly a first working version on
> master.
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> Greetings,
> Matthias
>
>
> [AGPUSH-38] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-38
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev