Re: [aerogear-dev] [Aeorgear Controller] Additional type support on endpoints methods

Do we need more discussion before integrating this PR ?

Great ! Do we need more discussion before integrating this PR ? Seb On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt;wrote: > +1 > > > -- > "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato > - > @abstractj > - > Volenti Nihil Difficile > > > > On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Douglas Campos wrote: > > > > > On 13/03/2013, at 05:02, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com(mailto: > daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com)&gt; wrote: > > > > > But requirements can change, and perhaps this should be discussed > again. > > > > You've nailed it, I think we should add this support. > > > > -- qmx > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org) > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev