for the security part we probably need to stick to the same versioning strategy adopted to
the rest of the subprojects 1.0.0.{Alpha,M1..Mn,CR,Final}
you can have as many Milestone releases as you wish - they aren't considered stable
too :)
I kinda miss the 0.0.x versioning, but makes more sense to align with the rest :P
On Oct 29, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
Hi my friend on aerogear-controller and aerogear-security before the
release of M6 on aerogear, we did something like this:
0.0.1.M6, 0.0.2.M6
But now I'm planning (must to be discussed with qmx and Daniel) to follow the roadmap
strictly and release our snapshots with the release ID (M1) from controller and not
aerogear (M7). I'd like to have something like: 0.0.1.M1….and 1 release per week.
The reason for 0.0.1 is because ag-security is not mature enough to be 1.0.0, in my
opinion.
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> hi,
>
> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>
>
> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>
> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
> you would call it).
>
> thoughts?
>
> -M
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-- qmx