Re: [aerogear-dev] Android keys (Re: AeroGear Push Message Format)

On 06/18/2013 10:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me&gt; wrote: > We don't have special words on Android, but we can use the same of iOS > and shoot the same behaviors. wdyt? > Like you did on the PR, for "alert", right ? I personally do like that very much So Android doesn't define any specific "keys".

Are you asking for some generic "keys" which pushee and ag-android will "natively" support?

> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: > >> Summers, Passos, >> >> >> wondering if we should/could honor "android" specific keys as well >> (similar to the iOS keys that we "honor") >> >> See: >> >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/blob/master/docs/specs/aerogear-... >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: >> >>> reminder, that ID is just the primary key :-) >>> >>> meaningful are "pushApplicationID" and "variantID" >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: >>> >>>> Luke >>>> >>>> once this landed, it will be "pushApplicationID" and "variantID" - >>>> the ID is than meaningless (at least for PushEE server). >>>> >>>> -M >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt;wrote: >>>> >>>>> plus plus >>>>> >>>>> On May 31, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-86 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> On May 31, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> somehow the device needs to say: "I belong to android variant" >>>>>> >>>>>> besides the @Id /PK, we can have a second field / column that >>>>>> represents: >>>>>> * PushAppID >>>>>> * VariantID >>>>>> >>>>>> Yup. Having these would solve that >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Was that your question? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday, May 31, 2013, Lucas Holmquist wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> something that i was thinking about after doing some examples is >>>>>>> that i'm not sure how i feel about using the PK's of each table as the >>>>>>> identifier to register/broadcast clients. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are sort of giving meaning to data that really shouldn't have >>>>>>> meaning. it should really only be used to identify the row. It might be >>>>>>> better to have another key on each table/object that is the identifier. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So in one of the examples i did, the app on the device will >>>>>>> register the device with the push server, but i needed to also include the >>>>>>> id of the variant instance >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i guess i'm thinking if someone migrates their database, these >>>>>>> keys could get messed up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wdyt? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On May 28, 2013, at 2:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf < >>>>>>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Corinne Krych < >>>>>>> corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> in selective push is: >>>>>>> ==> variant: iOS + alias: mwessendorf >>>>>>> a valid criteria too? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> yes. let me update the related doc(s) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28 May 2013 08:51, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28 May 2013 08:48, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TYPO: >>>>>>> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one >>>>>>> iOS variant) + deviceType:iPadMini + alias: mwessendorf >>>>>>> or >>>>>>> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) >>>>>>> + deviceType:iPhone + alias: mwessendorf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf < >>>>>>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Corinne Krych < >>>>>>> corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When doing selective push query, is there any overlap between >>>>>>> mobile variant (which I understand like mobile type which contains >>>>>>> certificates) and device type? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MobileVariant (or call it type) is something like "Android", or >>>>>>> "iOS". >>>>>>> deviceTypes would be iPad, iPod, iPhone, iWatch :) - or "Android >>>>>>> Table", "Andrpid phone", android what not >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure.... ideally there are several variants: >>>>>>> - iOS iPhone 5 optimised app in the app store >>>>>>> - iOS iPhone 4s optimised app in the app store >>>>>>> - iOS iPhone 3 optimised app in the app store >>>>>>> - iOS iPad mini optimised app in the app store >>>>>>> etc :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But, if there is only one variant, it's totally valid to install >>>>>>> an iOS application (from the appstore), on an iPad and an iPhone; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Both aimed at defining categories. >>>>>>> Are those categories defined and fixed in the spec or can they be >>>>>>> extended? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't understand categories, here >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can we do a selective push based on mobileType=mobile variant and >>>>>>> alias=john@gmail? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev