Re: [aerogear-dev] Making testing PRs review faster

I think it can be assigned and discussed with people familiar about Groovy. Maybe get in touch with whom is familiar with it? This thread might work as a hint http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-To-Groovy-or-not-t... Karel Piwko wrote: > Heya, > > while developing tests, we often fix something in one PR while we hit the > same problem while different PR is developed. I'm not sure whether it's > temporary situation or not, but right now we need a faster occurrence of > PRs in master. > > That said, I really like "reviewers required" model used in Aerogear. So I > was thinking of making a "mirror" of aerogear master (either branch or > separate repository), where I could do the PR review, merge and later PR > the master for review in bigger chunks. I'd like to avoid separating code > and itests if possible, as this makes writing white tests a pita. > > How does it sound to you? Any comments/suggestions welcomed. > > Thanks, > > Karel > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev