Re: [aerogear-dev] Making testing PRs review faster

Heya, while developing tests, we often fix something in one PR while we hit the same problem while different PR is developed. I'm not sure whether it's temporary situation or not, but right now we need a faster occurrence of PRs in master. That said, I really like "reviewers required" model used in Aerogear. So I was thinking of making a "mirror" of aerogear master (either branch or separate repository), where I could do the PR review, merge and later PR the master for review in bigger chunks. I'd like to avoid separating code and itests if possible, as this makes writing white tests a pita. How does it sound to you? Any comments/suggestions welcomed. Thanks, Karel _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev