On 01/07/2013 17:29, Kris Borchers wrote:
On Jul 1, 2013, at 11:24, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:06:13AM -0400, Lucas Holmquist wrote:
>>> Just wanted to see what we decided here:
>>>
>>> I believe going with ember has been decided(?), but what about the
>>> css framework.
>>>
>>> I know there are some who would like to see us start using topcoat,
>>> but thats up to the team
>> I think we need to get there, not sure if having two new things at the
>> same time is wise
> i can agree with that, just wanted to see what the teams thoughts
> are here
My thought is picking up a new CSS framework isn't that hard and work
has already started with ember so why not both. Someone's going to
have to figure out the appropriate classes in bootstrap if that was
used instead so why not use something better? Just my 2 cents.
Unless there's a huge benefit to using something new, I'd stick with
something that is already commonplace. Since it will be Lucas and me
working on the UI implementation mostly (I already know Bootstrap, don't
know about Lucas) why pick something else?
Hylke